Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

There are a lot of reasons to hate AI, I don’t really buy into this one. “New technology only captures a subset of knowledge” is just not a new issue, and fearmongering around it is not new either.

I would be concerned about language collapse (i.e. models incrementally forget vocabulary + fail to adapt to new terms leading to language becoming incrementally worse) before I would worry about knowledge collapse, and I’m not that worries about language collapse.

Replying to @⁨yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

Fortunately I have media literacy and know that the existence of someone marketing a scary narrative doesn’t actually provide any credibility. I can read scary headlines and pass it through the “does the make sense?” filter before getting worried.

I agree the friction + manipulation that LLMs introduce is troubling, but “knowledge collapse” is the extreme end of that concern.

Replying to @⁨NotAnOtter@lemmus.org⁩

Do you think Terrance Tao (who’s been sanguine on AI) and all the other top mathematicians on the planet succinctly explaining how LRMs are going to decimate our understanding of mathematics are marketing something?

You’re an ignoramus whose tiny dregs of insight can survive virtually cataclysm. I’m not so sure about humanity’s larger domain of shared knowledge.