The only people looking to expand open source to mean things like open weights, are the same as people looking to have AI be a thing.
wholookshere
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
Ai disclosure?
You should as a rule read community rules before posting your projects.
Your missing the disclosure in your title
Replying to @FishFace@piefed.social
And all 3 hinge on the premise of courts will do ‘sane’ things, without any kind of justification for them. So yeah, all 3 are moot if you remove that assumption.
So how much money should be risked on that bet?
Replying to @FishFace@piefed.social
No, you made a large assumption that this holds up in court completely, predicated on the idea that anything but would be disastorus.
I don’t buy that premise, and neither does codeberg. So again, why should they put money up in that assumption?
Replying to @FishFace@piefed.social
So then why are you asking other people to on your behalf?
Replying to @qynruidaetkuuproon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
vger.toI cannot speak for OP but you have intentionally mischaracterized my position on another matter instead of discussing and addressing the criticism leveled against Codeberg's decision here and broader culture of authoritarian behaviour happening within the left. I am myself left wing, its a mischaracterization to say "knowingly, intentionally continue to fund neo-Nazis in Sweden". Because first of all, I didn't know. Secondly, if you read what I actually wrote I say I do not approve of the action by co-owner of Mullvad and that his actions to not represent the the entirety of the organization. Furthermore, in your attempt at ad-hominem, you selectively cherry pick a nuance take on the Mullvad situation where I am rightfully concerned about the loss of a much needed force in the sphere of digital rights and online privacy. And then neglect to highlight a post I made before where I am critical of emerging far-right fascism and the neoliberalism that fuels it. My initial critisicm of tReplying to @FishFace@piefed.social
There is a good chance that LLMs are sufficiently transformative that courts will decide they don’t infringe the copyright of their sources.
How much money are you willing to put in to test that?
Replying to @Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
What’s stopping you from doing it yourself? Be the change you want to see.
Replying to @qynruidaetkuuproon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Not the person your arguing with.
But what sarcastic comment? You entrrd this thread with a long winded winge.
Replying to @712@discuss.tchncs.de
Sorry typo. They’re not for profit.
Which is not what both github and gitlab are trying to be.
Why should they spend money hosting content the people who are dontating don’t want?
Replying to @RobotToaster@mander.xyz
Whats stopping you from taking the software to host codrberg, and host your own?
Because its not the license. That’s software, not a service provider.
Replying to @712@discuss.tchncs.de
Who says they’re trying?
They’re a not for profit…