Replying to an earlier post

It actually makes perfect sense to do this if your goal is corporate capture of the market.

From another article :

On one side are leading A.I. companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, which claim that some A.I. models are too dangerous to be developed in the open and must be tightly controlled — by businesses like themselves — for safety.

piefed.socialDiscussing Silicon Valley Splits Over Closing the Borders to Chinese A.I.> On one side are leading A.I. companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, which claim that some A.I. models are too dangerous to be developed in the open and must be tightly controlled — by businesses li…

Replying to @⁨Korkki@lemmy.ml⁩

So many shitty managers, C-suite execs, and AI accelerationists are convinced that they can replicate an entire workflow with a single vague prompt that will print infinite money. They can’t comprehend the idea that you still have to understand what you’re asking for, how to ask for it, how to spot what’s wrong with the output, and what needs to be done to correct it.

AI will never be able to do that. Not because it’ll never be technically capable, but because it was never, or will ever, be designed to.

Replying to @⁨themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

Huggingface (or some other benchmarking company) needs to put its servers in a country with real cyberintrusion laws with teeth. Somewhere where an announcement like this would result in prison sentences and the company’s license to operate being revoked in the country until they could demonstrate via third party audits that their operations are acting in a secure and legal manner.