Thabknyou for sharing. I had missed the announcement, so pleased to know the option is available.

I have fully automated the creation and renewal of my certs and have just short of 50 certs that I manage in total. Every single one automated using NixOS / ACME / lego.

Technically I could easily implement this, just have to switch my config.

Honest question, are there any particular security benefits to this (especially for a home lab)?

I can understand the short lived time span further reduces risk of compromise, yet the existing time span is already “much shorter than traditional certificates”. Does it have a substantial impact on our security posture?

At work, I used ssh-signed certificates for Linux server access - those certs are only valid for about 15 minutes.

The whole idea of shorter lifetime certificates is to address if a certificate is compromised. (Especially for client certificates which, iirc, Let’s Encrypt no longer offers).

For a home lab? With no externally accessible services? Short-lived certs aren’t really a big deal. Nobody is going to be hacking your homelab, stealing your private keys, poisoning your internal DNS, and pointing you to a different, malicious service.

If you’re a developer for an important open source project, they might.

Attacking the xz project wasn’t done because the attacker cared about anything that the xz maintainer had. It was because he was trusted and the software he maintained had been given a fair bit of trust by certain maintainers and could be compromised and used as a vector into other systems that indirectly relied on that open-source project.

I had no idea “single use certificates” were a thing. It makes sense, although from my personal perspective I have always worked with managed identities and privilege escalation.

I have almost no internet facing services, although the two I have I might swap for the short lived variants. As you said, risk of misuse due to compromise goes down so that makes sense.

For my other services, they are all running on HTTPS, but only available internally over LAN or VPN, all with isolated VLANs sort of like a Hub Spoke model. The two certs that are internet facing are basically for getting access to my VPN. Might swap the internal services to short lived anyway if the automation works well, as I said before, it’s fully automated anyway.

Certbot came with a systemd timer running twice a day (0, 12 +12h random) that only renews –iirc– when the certificate has 30 days or less to live. Also I looked it up and my (version 6.7) Certbot neither mentions the option with the --help option, nor in the manual (where there is just one instance of “profiles exist, no other details given”).

So they probably need another way than a random blog post when they want users to use (or even just know about) that option…

It’s been pretty much a set-and-forget experience

Yeah, that’s what it always has been. So no need to change anything unless they make it the new standard on their side with an update…

@Ooops @stratself Certbot renews a certificate when the remaining lifetime is lower than 30 %. If you change the profile from tlsserver (90 days) to shortlived (6 days), you do not need to adjust the renewal interval manually, because it is relative to the cert livetime.
I think it is not Letsencrypt's part to document how to use the different profiles with certbot. It should be explained in the documentation of the ACME client (certbot and others).

I know that I could easily change my config. My point is that a) they are failing to advertise this and b) I don’t see any reason to do it. I understand the arguments about security benefits of shorter certificates on their side and iirc they are already planning to change it from 3 months to 1.5 months in the future. But in what scenario do I benefit from a short-term certificate as long as the regular ones are still available anyway?

@Ooops I do not understand what you mean with "they are failing to advertise this". Letsencrypt has announced in in their blog:
https://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/16/6-day-and-ip-certs
https://letsencrypt.org/2025/02/20/first-short-lived-cert-issued
The profiles are documented:
https://letsencrypt.org/docs/profiles/
It is your deciscion what profile to use. If you use the shortlived profile and your key is compromised, you benefit from the short lifetime. This benefit you have regardless of the availability of the 90 day certs.

If you use the shortlived profile and your key is compromised, you benefit from the short lifetime.

Maybe I’m just too stupid to understand how those certificates work.

But in what scenario is my key compromised but not my server? Because someone getting control of my server can just get an new long-term certificate. That was my actual point in the comment above. I understand the argument of added security if they only issue short-term certificates. But where is the benefit of my short-term certificate when someone compromising my server can just get a new long-term one in seconds?

Also we are talking about self hosting. I understand the issue of revoking certificates when you have a massive userbase where some might miss the revocation for quite some time. Not so much with the dozen max family and friends.

Using OpenBao as my CA so I’ve had 24hr certs for a while now.

I’m happy with 90 day certs for homelab stuff: I’m not worried about anyone MITMing my network. I figure the short lived certs are more important for people who provide services with a significant external user-base, or who process sensitive transactions.

I have my certbot set to check every 12 hours and renew at 60 days. Renewing every 3 days would be 20x more load on Let’s Encrypt systems, and that feels like abuse of a free service for my use case.

I think they encourage that increased frequency by offering shortlived certs to begin with…

Although do note that normal certificates will reduce its lifetime to 45 days over the next few years

Certs get cut in half in the next couple of years.

Honest, non-techie question: How is it an advantage? Given modern crypto isnt it more likely that a mitm didn’t crack the crypto but instead got somehow else in the middle and just can “ignore” certs renewals?

You’re gonna get different viewpoints, ranging from “yeah, but it’s popular” to “shut up”.

Several reasons

• If a private key leaks, a shorter certificate lifespan limits the fallout
• Faster upgrades to new cryptographic standards. If some of the crypto methods used get broken, short lived certificates means they get replaced with newer methods faster
• Short lived certificates force sysadmins to automate the renewal process. This prevents expired certificates due to forgetting the manual renewal.
• Certificate lifetime and domain ownership mismatch. You could buy a 2 year certificate for somedomain.com and then sell the domain or just let it expire and have it picked up by someone else. You then have a valid certificate for a domain you no longer ow and you could MitM traffic for the new owner’s website.

My last job had an Onlineshop, 4years in a row the colleague dealing with ssl wad on vacation when the cert ran out.

Your colleague sucked at automation. Normally, I’d say no one should be bothered on vacation, but in this case you should have called him on his vacation, since he didn’t value anyone else’s time either.

The manager sucked. There’s a lot of solutions to this issue but cross training and proper backup preparation are the most ideal ones.

ACME is automated. Since it is all automated they are shorting the life. If your not automated have fun or purchase a longer one.

Short lived certificates force sysadmins to automate the renewal process. This prevents expired certificates due to forgetting the manual renewal.

That was already the case with the 90 day ones. No sane person is going to be manually renewing certificates every 3 months.

Emphasis on “sane”

You make some good arguments so I’m not attacking you at all, just my thoughts on your points. These short renewal times are getting to the point of ridiculousness and creating another point of failure with little time to do anything about it. I find these super short certs less than useful, create many more possible problems, and not really necessary except for a small set of circumstances. And I have been in IT as a web dev/sys admin/systems architect for over 30 years now.

• If a private key leaks you’ve likely done something wrong. Practice better key management and don’t be stupid
• Updating certs to keep up with new crypto standards is useless. For one they don’t change that often and if there is a pressing reason you can’t update earlier.
• Yes the processes have to be automated which is not a bad idea at all. But you are completely relying on the service to not be down and that something on your end hasn’t also broken. Anybody that hasn’t ever been a sys admin has had several automated process die for no apparent reason.
• This could actually be an issue but totally out of your control. This is only relevant if you domain hop frequently and if your that worried about security, you aren’t doing that.

It is all automated so who cares. And if it is down for 3 days there is something wrong.

If your automation breaks on day 1 of your vacation, you’re now forced to spend some of your vacation fixing it. Hope you were checking email.

A private key leaking is bad, since anyone with the private key can decrypt data that was encrypted with it.

Traditionally, the way that leaked certs were handled was via Certificate Revocation Lists (CRL). CRLs contain lists of revoked certificates - their serial number, revocation date, and the reason why they were revoked.

However, CRLs are imperfect. Checking for revoked certificates every time you go to a site would slow things down a lot, as the lists are now too large to check and download real-time. Modern browsers and other TLS clients periodically download the lists in the background. Also, it might take a while between when the certificate is compromised and when the company notices the compromise.

Because of this, the CA/Browser forum (a group with all the major browser and TLS certificate vendors) have started dropping the max lifetime of certificates. The idea is that even if a private key does leak, the time frame that it’s usable for will be significantly shorter and any leaks should (in theory) cause less damage.

• The original maximum duration was 39 months: Three years plus an extra three months leeway for obtaining and deploying new certificates.
• March 2018: Reduced to 825 days
• September 2020: Reduced to 398 days
• March 2026: Reduced to 200 days
• March 2027: Planned to reduce to 100 days
• March 2028: Planned to reduce to 47 days

All modern deployments, regardless of if they’re using free or paid certs, should have their renewals fully-automated, so in theory the validity period shouldn’t matter as much as it did in the past. All major vendors (Let’s Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, GlobalSign, AWS, SSL .com, etc) support ACME now. Reducing the validity is also a forcing function t o ensure automation is actually implemented.

somehow else in the middle and just can “ignore” certs renewals?

I’m not sure that’s possible, since an attacker in the middle shouldn’t be able to obtain a valid certificate for the domain. Certificates have a “not valid after” date encoded into them, after which the certificate is considered invalid and you get an error.

Since the certificate revocation list doesn’t really work. They decided to shorten certificates lifespan. 90 days down to 45 and who knows what is next.

I’m using Nginx Proxy Manager. Apparently my letsrenew certs are good for 2 yrs and I don’t see any way to configure that in the ui.

I migrated from vanilla Nginx Proxy Manager to NPMplus (because of CrowdSec), and it defaults to short-lived certificates. Other than temporarily making my Uptime Kuma SSL monitors completely freak out because my certificates “were too close to expiration”, everything still works exactly the same.

Interesting, I didn’t know NPMplus was a thing. Looks like I’ve got some researching and possibly reconfiguring to do…

I’m just using regular Nginx, which I’ve been using for 20 years. What does Nginx Proxy Manager or npmplus do better?

I’ve been meaning to try Angie too, which is a fork of Nginx.

Not really sure they do anything “better”, it’s mainly for convenience. It’s an all-in-one solution with a nice UI and sane defaults. That helps me have a somewhat consistent setup across all my hosted services. If you’re happy with managing Nginx directly, then you probably have no reason to use these.

Makes sense! I didn’t realise it has a UI.

I’ve got a bunch of snippets in /etc/nginx/snippets/, so for example I just need to add include snippets/proxy.conf to a server block to add most of the configuration needed for a reverse proxy. I’ve been using Nginx for long enough that I just write the rest of the server block by hand.

Not 6 day but already set under what it’s going to be worldwide in 2029. digicert.com/…/tls-certificate-lifetimes-will-off…

One step closer to single use certificates. Great…

So much certificate wrapper waste in the landfills. Smh

Everyone in here taking about an the automations they’ve done for certs and I just use Caddy. It handles all that for me.

Caddy is a good piece of software.

I’ve been using Nginx for 20 years and don’t really have a reason to switch, so I’m still using it. I use certbot, so it’s just one command to create the certificate initially, and then it auto-renews automatically via a systemd timer.

Yeah but if you want to use something different, or may need to use different web servers or proxies from time to time, it’s better to have the cert renewal stuff separated.

Also, for any provider that’s off the beaten path you have to build caddy yourself to include the right plugin and that’s just meh.

Caddy’s fine if you only use one provider and only Caddy all the time but other than that no.

DNS for let’s encrypt and just have the same definition for all of your caddy servers and whatever you point your domains at will work as expected. Single config and redundancy with certs.

I’m already building a custom image of Caddy with plugins for Crowdsec integration. It’s not hard to do. But I have no reason to use anything other than the default Let’s Encrypt setup.

No, and if there was an option for a 20-year certificate I would have taken it.

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

[Thread #119 for this comm, first seen 7th Oct 2026, 05:50] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

Yes, with Caddy and haven’t noticed a thing, and had no complaints. So it has been perfectly fine and it is all automated.

I don’t know what the BFD is. Noone is supposed to handle certs manually anyway. OK, maybe companies that did not get the message but nowadays this is supposed to be automated and then it does not really matter whether the cert is valid for 90, 45, 30, or 6 days.

For security, it does matter, shorter is better.

No, because I often use Cloudflare, and I end up getting emails when Cloudflare notices a new SSL cert, and I don’t want to get those emails every 6 days. I already get more than enough emails in general.

No, that’s stupid.

NPM renews my certs for me, anyway.