Replying to @silverpill@mitra.social
Thank you!
On your first question, if anything I think it can be an incentive and opportunity to introduce that paradigm shift I mentioned in the other thread..
https://social.coop/@smallcircles/117194662868256325
Though by itself it doesn't bring that, it is an enabler. Other than that it bumps into the same social challenges of what the fediverse is, can be, and who + how to get there, and I found the current approaches across the ecosystem to be very tech-first, "let's create the tech and then see what it can do" like. There's no real consensus on what C2S is and can bring to the ecosystem, I guess.
🫧 Social coding commons@smallcircles@social.coop@silverpill @phnt @jupiter_rowland @rimu @elle
On the social side its more about perspective shift than defining shared vision.
For Social coding commons and Social experience design (SX) I use the following definition for Social networking: Any direct and indirect human interaction between people. I consider Social media a subset of social networking that's more focused on publishing of content.
This definition considers ALL human interaction, both online and offline. And it provides the scope to think of when designing solutions. Social networking is everywhere. And importantly it flows seamlessly together, forming our day-to-day social experience. Everything is integrated.
To translate that to technology, the fediverse would be a unified online space, where we consume services that are introduced to the network by developers.
As solution developer I'd be shielded from the terms in your technology tree. I'd be focused on designing business domains for my solution: a new service.