Autistici/Inventati’s Press Release, 5 September 2026
Banca etica shuts down A/I funds

-- https://keepitfree.ai/announcements/banca-etica-shuts-down-a/i-funds/

This is not surprising. Sanctions make you toxic - nobody wants to be accused of terrorism financing or money laudnering. Your bank accounts are frozen and centralized services deplatform you (some may remember TornadoCash and other similar cases).

There are two solutions to this problem: physical cash and decentralized digital currencies. Physical cash only works at small scale, and in some places it is gradually being phased out. The second solution is better. However, A/I donation page says "Sorry, but we don’t accept Bitcoin" and links to a post from 2013 explaining that bitcoins "do not give any specific advantage compared to a normal bank account" and is a "pump & dump done to dupe the ultra-libertarian anarco-capitalists".

Well, fortunately, ultra-libertarian anarco-capitalists didn't see it that way and have spent all these years studying the blade building a parallel financial system which nobody can shut down - even US.

Bitcoin is not perfect but it is much better than a bank because no one can shut down your account. You shouldn't be accepting donations in Bitcoin, though - that would put donors at risk. The chain is transparent and the privacy tricks that exist in Bitcoin (e.g. mixers) are generally counter-productive when you're facing a powerful adversary because they make you stand out of the crowd. The real purpose of Bitcoin is to be a bridge between fiat money and Monero, where everything remains hidden: the sender, the recipient and the transcation amount. Besides meeting in person, it is the only safe way to buy a coffee for a Specially Designated Global Terrorist @cavallette

keepitfree.aiBanca Etica Shuts Down a/I Funds · Keep the Internet free

Replying to @⁨silverpill@mitra.social⁩

@silverpill @cy @cavallette i'm going to do both, advocate for a right tool like forgefed and complain that it seems development on it has stalled? This seems to have been a really bad few years for communication. I've now even seen a notice at the top of the Cdeberg page signalling they have caved to the sithlords. (see 2.) what does it mean, silverpill?

Replying to @⁨frogzone@wizard.casa⁩

@frogzone @cy @cavallette

>i'm going to do both, advocate for a right tool like forgefed and complain that it seems development on it has stalled?

It has not stalled, but the work on Forgejo federation is very slow. However, there is a another ForgeFed implementation that seems to move faster: https://codeberg.org/activitypub-rs/activityforge

>Cdeberg page signalling they have caved to the sithlords. (see 2.) what does it mean, silverpill?

They don't like crypto: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1254#issuecomment-19820413

What it means for us, I don't know. I've set up a mirror on my own Forgejo instance, just in case

Summary card of repository activitypub-rs/activityforge, described as: ForgeFed implementation in RustCodeberg.orgactivityforgeForgeFed implementation in Rust
en