Sibrosan

@rauschma Dutch

@prism @grayrattus @Roelmaalderink @bitsoffreedom

That the intended use of the pervert glasses that META sells constitutes, in general, a gross violation of people's privacy, even if the company pretends it's just a harmless, fun product, and that even META's own employees are painfully aware of that, when confronted with someone using it in their presence.

#Meta #pervertglasses #privacy

@grayrattus @Roelmaalderink @bitsoffreedom

Je reden om die vergelijking te maken is dat je aanneemt dat ik het net zo verkeerd vind als jij om Amazon-employees aan te spreken op het morele aspect van hun werk voor Amazon?

🤭

@grayrattus @Roelmaalderink @bitsoffreedom

You mean *in your opinion* it is harassment and not funny.

I think that, to the extent that it can be considered harassment, it is not undeserved, since those people work for META, and moreover I find the videoclip both enlightening and funny.

@ck0 @grayrattus @Roelmaalderink @bitsoffreedom

You mean: given this faulty logic? I suppose so 🤔

@grayrattus @Roelmaalderink @bitsoffreedom

What do you mean "harass them"

The guy simply uses the product that their employer markets to the public, within their employer's guidelines for it.

Do you somehow suggest that this is not perfectly all right?

@grayrattus @Roelmaalderink @bitsoffreedom

They work for META, fully knowing what kind of company it is they work for, don't they? "Working for money" doesn't mean they are not complicit.