Replying to @Elizafox@social.treehouse.systems
@Elizafox
This pretty much.

Personal Account | Level 27 Enbycat located in Austria | Class: Meowgician
Sentient AI rocks (whoa, they made rocks think..). "AI"(the boring overhyped kind worshipped by the tech broligarchy) stinks (in a bad way).
lots of meowmeowmeow :3 and someday maybe tech tinkerings and art atrocities (but mostly meow :3)
I do programming like that one cat from the "cat typing on a laptop" meme *smashes keys randomly*
This Cat is not a dev, but owns a .dev Domain regardless because it's cool.
Fact: likes headpats and hugs ^^
Another Fact: overuses parentheses and brackets.
Please use CWs, I do so too!
(This cat is Autistic, ADHD and Chronically Depressed(as in: I have chronic depression (the one one is probably stuck with for life)))
🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈
Replying to @Elizafox@social.treehouse.systems
@Elizafox
This pretty much.
Replying to @Elizafox@social.treehouse.systems
I agree with that sentiment but I do think that is quite similar to how copyright was/is handled and a lot of laws end up. If there is a law that, in it's ideal form would benefit the most, you can be sure it will be stripped down so much, it will essentially be turned ineffective just to serve the rich and powerful (so much for democracy..)
I would say AI(Generative AI in particular) is a means of further consolidating power towards the top, similar to how industrial machinery made it harder for individuals to own their means of production. (Except that the machinery did have more use cases IMO, but that's a different story. I think the luddite movement had a point though)
Replying to @Elizafox@social.treehouse.systems
@Elizafox
I'd even argue that openAI and the likes work on the same line as "copyright", as both mechanisms take from the masses and sell- I mean rent it back to us through subscriptions/ads
Copyright is not a weapon against AI, in the same way that AI is not a weapon against Copyright.