prettybunnys

I think we’ve been clear

One infers malice, which I’m not.

Sometimes bad things happen for reasons that aren’t malicious, understanding that will help.

No that’s a pretty solid twist of my words

I believe the issue comes down to not needing to later retract things to change the statement, like yeah I know Apple was convicted of this and currently is “convicted” but if they appeal and win and in 5 years the article says “Apple convicted of X, must pay Y” you’d necessarily need a follow up article to correct it OR a retraction or whatever later.

Anyways. I bet that’s the reason, even if I agree that what you said should be the way it’s reported as it is currently the most accurate

She was awful before the money, money just made her able to do it more