Replying to @Glowstick@lemmy.world
Universal free health care.
Replying to @Glowstick@lemmy.world
Universal free health care.
Replying to @Glowstick@lemmy.world
Have you tried to destroy a Nokia 3310?. Case closed.
Replying to @Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world
[bums], [boobs], [other]
Replying to @tabular@lemmy.world
That kinda depends on where in the world you are. In Europe we have strong protections such that users need to consent to that type of testing (remember those annoying cookie banners? well what do you think they’re for 😉). But if you’re in the US… well, my apologies.
Replying to @tabular@lemmy.world
Randomised is not what makes it ethical. It’s what makes the AB test statistically valid such that you can test your hypothesis.
Ethical would be to run the test, gauge the click through rate to checkout to find a winner, then for all those you charged the higher price to give them a discount code such that everyone gets the product at the same price. What you’re testing is the click through rate of a price advertised further up the funnel.
Maybe later you can say ok the rates didn’t drop off people seem ok with the higher price. Higher price for all. Or not as the AB test would reveal.
Replying to @Armand1@lemmy.world
This is UhhhmuuuhriKa! Hoo-rah.
USA USA USA!
🥲
Replying to @Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world
I vote Democrats. Yes. Because they’re any better. 🥲
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
And they should rightly ban sales to the US. Check mate orange man.
Replying to @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
Err, sir. This is a pile on / anti Google thread. Please take your comments elsewhere. Please and thank you.
Pitchforks! Get yer pitchforks. Four for a paaand!