Replying to @⁨frongt@lemmy.zip⁩

sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/

And thats just the tip of the iceberg.

Also, while Minstral is fine, it is pretty much obsolete…

Friends Don't Let Friends Use OllamaSleeping RobotsFriends Don't Let Friends Use Ollama | Sleeping RobotsOllama gained traction by being the first easy llama.cpp wrapper, then spent years dodging attribution, misleading users, and pivoting to cloud, all while riding VC money earned on someone else's engine. Here's the full history, and why the alternatives are better.

Replying to @⁨frongt@lemmy.zip⁩

Its sleazy software, and IMO its defaults provide a really terrible 1st time experience. It convinces 1st time users that locally run LLMs are terrible, and goes out of its way to be incompatible with other stuff.

I think LM Studio would be a much better “1st time” recommendation. Its not perfect either, but its lightyears better, not an active con like ollama, and its smoother to “graduate” from it to croco.cpp or llama.cpp or something.

Replying to @⁨frongt@lemmy.zip⁩

Pretty funny. Most of this article was saying that ollama sucks now and they’re just popular because there were one of the first. Personally I started with them, too, but constantly ran into issues with them. I’ve have much better experiences with jan, open web UI, and LM studio. The first two are foss, and the second properly attributes their use of open source projects, unlike ollama.

Edit: nevermind, it’s the link below me. It’s still early in the morning, my bad