is there any set definition of the "open social web" that anyone is aware of?
Replying to @liaizon@wake.st
@liaizon As far as I can tell, "open social web" is what commercial platforms like WordPress and Ghost use instead of "fediverse".
Replying to @silverpill@mitra.social
@silverpill there are a lot of different variations and groups using `words` in various ways. have you seen this initiative https://european.social
european.socialThe European Social Stack · An open declarationAn open declaration: The European Social Stack. Open Social Platforms and Private Messaging.Replying to @liaizon@wake.st
@liaizon Yes, what about it?
I see a bunch of startups that are trying to sell fediverse to eu governments.
Replying to @silverpill@mitra.social
@silverpill @liaizon Why sell something that is decentralized and beyond their control to governments that are, in fact, seeking something that runs counter to the very nature of the Fediverse?
Replying to @xailog@wizard.casa
@xailog @liaizon The idea is very simple:
- Find a grassroots ecosystem, which is not very well known to general public
- Start promoting it to general public, while inserting your name or brand in every communication.
- People not familiar with the ecosystem think that you are very important.
- You get accolades, invited to conferences, receive grants and contracts.
- Grassroots ecosystem slowly dies and is replaced by structures that you control.
- PROFIT
Replying to @liaizon@wake.st
Hi @liaizon,
I stick to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_web and consider the 'open' whimsical and redundant.
There is no such thing as a 'closed #social #web' to distinguish from.