posted in Technology
Sony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual property
www.axios.com/2026/08/29/anthropic-sony-warner-music-copyrightposted in Technology
Sony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual property
www.axios.com/2026/08/29/anthropic-sony-warner-music-copyrightReplying to @cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world
Uh AI steals everyone’s work. How it’s legal I’ll never know.
Replying to @redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world
because it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.
Replying to @jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
I saw this ruling and fully disagree.
Replying to @jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
So if I modify someone else’s art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?
Replying to @blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
if you have enough lawyers and the art ia substantially different (different inteded use) they might
Replying to @jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
You got downvoted but this is just true lol
(Fuck AI slop though)
Replying to @jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
If AI continues to be treated as transformative work, there should also be a valid case to kill licensing requirements for sampling music. After all, there you’re literally using small clips of someone’s music or similar to make undeniably new art.
Replying to @antimidas@sopuli.xyz
To be fair, that should have happened a long time ago. Copyright law hasn’t been fit for purpose for a long time.