Julian Fietkau

@silverpill I'm not a big fan of W3C's use of GitHub, but other than that the difference in venue feels relatively skin-deep to me. If this approach results in a cohesive document, I would see no issue with also posting it as a FEP draft while it goes through the CG/WG feedback loop. That would likely help adoption by implementers.

@silverpill Kind of. The effort from Feb/Mar sadly fizzled out, but the T&S Task Force recently called for a Community Group process with the same goal (adaption of the GTS spec with hopefully minimal changes) and I'm now hoping to contribute my interim artifacts there and maybe help finish the work.

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety/discussions/152

@liaizon Thank you! 🙂 FediDay ends at 4pm on the 13th. If your thing is that same evening I can probably join as a visitor if I'm welcome! I booked my return train to Munich for the 14th because the return trip would have been too late on the 13th.

@liaizon This is unrelated to FediDay yeah? I'll be in Berlin from the 10th (evening) to the 14th.

If you ever want me somewhere for a fediverse event or workshop or whatever, we can try to make it relevant for my current job so my boss @Lambo will sign for travel costs. 🙃

@tom @julian@activitypub.space The SciOp implementation and its AP plumbing are led by @jonny, that'll probably stay that way even with me now on board as well. I trust the direction, but I wouldn't count on a plug & play framework release within a plannable timeframe.

There have been other Python ActivityPub frameworks and libraries, from the top of my head I know https://git.fabiomanganiello.com/blacklight/pubby by @fabio and https://github.com/fedi-libs/apkit by @cocoa. See also https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-fediverse-development/ curated by @smallcircles.