posted in Technology
Codeberg bans vibe coded projects
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1279028/codeberg-bans-vibe-coded-projects
Relevant .
blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.htmlblog.codeberg.orgProtecting our FLOSS commons from LLMs — Codeberg News.codeberg-design ul { padding-left: revert !important; } In Brief: Two...
Replying to @beep@piefed.world
Seeing how codeberg is FOSS only, I’m not suprised. Vibe-coded projects is a HUGE legal trap considering licensing. And seeing how it’s based in Germany (notorious about siding with license owner against regular individuals) it only makes sense
Replying to @hitwright@lemmy.world
How can I prove that I have ownership over code I wrote myself, and that it isn’t copyrighted somewhere in the world? How can anyone prove that code is written by a human or AI (if you don’t commit obvious AI harness files and folders)?
Developers also “generate” code and are also “trained” on code they written as freelancers or employees for others which is potentially copyrighted. In that aspect just because it’s written by hand, doesn’t imply the writer has copyright on it.
Replying to @Fedditor385@lemmy.world
What? The point I was trying to make is that AI generated content is going to be treated as CC licensed. It is difficult to incorporate under other FOSS projects. Mostly considering that it doesn’t exactly distinguish between code, library, binary and patents. It’s simplier to avoid it altogether if your primary mission is FOSS
Considering your comment about verification of authorship, it’s likely to be treated the same as it is now. You are the author, unless proven otherwise. And you are right. Even if you are the author and wrote every single code yourself, you can infringe on someones paten