givesomefucks

No one here is using AI.

I’m sure you know what you mean with “here”, but no one else does…

They’d just have to randomly make assumptions

Boss insisting that I get to an agreement with him on ai usage.

Because most bosses don’t understand if one person is using a bunch of AI, that almost always means everyone else is spending a lot of time behind the scenes making it workable.

They want AI to cut workers, so one worker using AI and touching a lot of things looks great…

As long as the other humans are there to clean up the mess, the AI users appears super productive.

But then when managers layoff everyone that doesn’t use AI because they’re not as productive, chickens roost and you realize no one still in the building actually knows their own work let alone the wider product

Even if caught before layoffs, by the time a worker’s over reliance on AI is noticed, that employee can often no longer function without it.

But besides all that:

Anyone that expects employers to still pay for tokens a decade from now is insane. We’re gonna see people taking 100k salary, and spend >50% of that on AI tokens themselves.

There’s no way American corporations will keep shouldering the cost, they’ll push that off onto the employees the second they can.

Those being treated as useless (goes back to No Child) is the fucking problems

Humans are not innately moral, someone needs to teach them that shit, that’s what history and philosophy is for

You haven’t ran into someone doing this on work emails?

They don’t read the full email they get, just far enough to see if they got what they want. Then they plug it into an AI, and tell it to respond, then copy/paste it back to Outlook and hit reply.

They’ll keep doing that, over and over. And it usually ends up with them insisting on a meeting to “discuss” where they essentially get in a loop of “it’ll work, just do it”

And it’s like pulling fucking teeth to get them to admit the only thing they’re basing that on, is a chatbot told them it would work.

People are worried about the kids, and we should be, but it rotted adults brains even faster, and because of their age they’ve got a much shorter clock to stop using it before effects are permanent. Couple with Covid related IQ drops and the fact that time is linear and we’ll keep getting older…

Society is fucked.

We need to seriously treat AI like an addictive drug that people aren’t capable of limiting themselves with.

Yep, that’s why every Microsoft game (even on Steam) now relies on “gaming services” to authentic.

It’s not about piracy, Foza gets pirated a lot and always has. If you’re pirating it, you can get around it. But if you have a legit copy, Microsoft uses that as an excuse to ID your computer and tie a name to it.

I really think it’s gonna be a big thing, they just kind of slipped it in without telling anyone. They’re gonna fuck around trying to constantly increase profit margins and lose their monopoly.

Then why the fuck doesn’t OpenAI use OpenAI to make a sandbox OpenAI can’t break out of?

If OpenAI can’t make a sandbox that OpenAI can’t break out of, then it can’t make security it can’t break thru either.

Meaning the product as sold is useless. And if anyone actually uses it, it will just be spinning in circles creating zero benefit and exacerbating almost every global issue we’re currently facing.

Some of that has to sink in:

Even if you’re right about chatbots being the future, that’s not a good future and we should avoid it.

The “human mistake” was not using adequate sandboxing…

It’s not one person that made a mistake, it’s a sign that no one involved understands their own product.

It’s also doesn’t mean their product is good, because the only way it could solve the task was breaking the sandbox and hacking a competitor. If it was actually sandboxed, it would have failed the task.

And since we don’t know what was stolen, it seems rash to assume it was a mistake and not an “oops, stole your trade secrets”. Because even if it was a mistake, it just proves Hughingface can do things OpenAI can’t.

I’d be interested to see if OpenAI’s model can still magically solve that initial taka it couldn’t before

If it can, that shows OpenAI absorbed the data into their model even if it was an accident.

No shit…

So will corporations and everyone else with the money to do it.

Wikipedia has ethos, and once someone is so famous they’ll have one, but lots of lesser known oligarchs get theirs taken down thru legal means.

But chatbots?

You just have to make a tech ro happy, for most that means money, but politicians can offer other things that are even worse for the rest of us, like favorable chatbot views.

No one should be shocked if politicians against chatbots have a chatbot bias against them as well.

The techbros will naturally juice their supporters and portray politicians who opposed them as bad.

The real headline should be:

OpenAI couldn’t contain their own product in what they told a client was a secure sandbox. Once it escaped the sandbox, the only way for it to attempt to solve the issue, was hack a Chinese competitor and steal trade secrets.

That’s what actually happened.

All these articles are to make it seem capable to rise the IPO price, and it’s wild people keep spreading them