Replying to @⁨evan@cosocial.ca⁩

@evan It depends on the terms of the agreement.

No agreement should be necessary, though - FEPs are in public domain, they can be implemented by anyone and can be included in other documents without restrictions.

Also, it is not clear what is the benefit of submitting a FEP to W3C. I already submitted it to the FEP repository, and this was always enough for everybody, including major players like Mastodon and Lemmy. These task forces look like totally unnecessary bureaucracy, I don't really have time for that.

@julian

Replying to an earlier post

@silverpill @feps @julian great question!

The W3C Community Group contributor license agreement goes beyond copyright -- it also covers patents and other intellectual property.

w3.org/community/about/process

It's great that FEPS are CC0 -- that makes it possible to redistribute the text freely verbatim or modified. However, it doesn't protect implementers from patents and other claims.

en