It never was a question can/can’t and always was is it economically and politically viable to continue $current_war. usa is certainly capable, there seems to be little will to actually fight in a war beyond showing off ‘we are still cool and powerful believe us’.
Some U.S. military officers, though, argue that drones are particularly deadly in this war because it has reached a stalemate with little battlefield movement. In a war of maneuver, the tank and other armor would come back into its own, they say.
That’s the neat part, you can’t maneuver, that’s why armor is virtually non-existent in engagements beyond being an artillery or slowly moving transport.
‘Hedgehog’ style defence for tanks and other armor actually works, and it takes a lot of effort to kill one of those, but they aren’t doing anything interesting and you can’t leave it alive unless there is total fire control on your side.
I can, they are supported by owrt.
It isn’t.
At least they should have good openwrt support!
Sunglasses dont do ‘absolitely nothing’.
That’s how root certs work, m*scovians will abuse it.
You either use disk encryption (and a lot of other things as well) and accept these concerns as part of the deal or you dont use it. That’s why actual security involves threat modeling and mitigation. Encryption by itself gives little more then headache.
tang
You can have multiple ways to unlock luks container, what’s the issue?