Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
git.gay/kopper/outpost-fe-2/commit/064d5234cdf0efa0ad4a9615fea70026eceb1051
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
you would think that you can call a function in a component and have that function do everything the component itself can do. you would think that wouldnt you. yeah you would.
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
@kopper sometimes i really want to rewrite svelte to my own image, no compiler, just signals and jsx transpiler
Replying to @eater@cijber.social
Replying to @kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work
@kopper i dont think so
in my little perfect world it would use a user defined Observable objects and collections which allow for a way better way to update cycles, without the abuse of proxies or deepobject diffing
i mean i assume there's a reason both, Windows XAML and JavaFX highly rely on observer pattern
Replying to @eater@cijber.social
@kopper current nerd sniping levels: I've implemented a generational arena in typescript
Replying to @eater@cijber.social
@kopper return to Java Observable

