Skip to main content
PPlamenu
HomeLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

inari@inari@piefed.zip
⁨1⁩mo

AI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after all

www.technologyreview.com/2026/08/18/1142188/ai-recursive-self-improvement/
1310139
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
chunes@chunes@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

found that AI agents could solve the engineering problems necessary to do AI research but lacked the judgment and creativity to produce original research at the caliber of papers accepted by a top machine-learning conference.

I mean that describes a majority of engineers. No small feat

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨14⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨08:43⁩en
2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
WormFood@WormFood@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨chunes@lemmy.world⁩

If the standard of ML talks at conferences I’ve attended is anything to go by then a top machine learning conference is functionally a daycare for the most annoying people you’ve ever met

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
DeadDigger@DeadDigger@lemmy.zip
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨chunes@lemmy.world⁩

Tbh a lot of ai conference papers would absolutely be writable from most engineers. A lot of papers are : we trained a model and got these results. They didn’t publish the weight though, so you would be unable to check the paper.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs