"tankie" is the most overused and beaten to death term in existence. you'd call the people the tanks were rolled in against "tankies"
https://social.treehouse.systems/@Elizafox/117447793474956221
social.treehouse.systems/@Elizafox/117447793474956221"tankie" is the most overused and beaten to death term in existence. you'd call the people the tanks were rolled in against "tankies"
https://social.treehouse.systems/@Elizafox/117447793474956221
social.treehouse.systems/@Elizafox/117447793474956221Replying to @charlotte@mastodon.ml
you're literally arguing against a marx you made up in your head. he was not talking about virtue. the entire point of his entire analytical framework is describing socioeconomic relationships without moral qualifiers. you're bringing the moral qualifiers back in.
https://social.treehouse.systems/@Elizafox/117447764286635943
social.treehouse.systems/@Elizafox/117447764286635943Replying to @charlotte@mastodon.ml
im so tired of leftslop
Replying to @charlotte@mastodon.ml
marx spent half his lifetime as a philosopher critiquing utopian socialists for trying to model abstract moral ideals to shape society after, and now he's being ascribed the talking points of utopian socialists. what the fuck are we even doing here.
Replying to @charlotte@mastodon.ml
in the Critique of the Gotha Programme, marx attacks the idea that a society's distribution of goods can be justified by applying an equal standard of labour contribution to everybody. he points out that individuals have different physical and intellectual capacities, different circumstances, and different needs. treating everyone as an abstractly equal worker doesn't make those differences disappear. the famous formulation of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" explicitly states "to his ability" and "to his needs" for this specific reason. he did not fail to account for the fact that different people have different needs, that was own critique of the contemporary social democrats.