PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

beep@beep@piefed.world
edited⁨24⁩d

Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1279028/codeberg-bans-vibe-coded-projects

Relevant .

blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.html
blog.codeberg.orgProtecting our FLOSS commons from LLMs — Codeberg News.codeberg-design ul { padding-left: revert !important; } In Brief: Two...
131089
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
theherk@theherk@lemmy.world
⁨24⁩d

Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

I get it, but determining and moreso verifying code is mostly generated is so intractable that this will likely not do anything practically. Well, perhaps it will discourage some disclosure.

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Dagnet@Dagnet@lemmy.world
⁨24⁩d

Replying to @⁨theherk@lemmy.world⁩

I think a lot of the time with these things is not really about filtering every single offending project but stablishing a legal precedent to remove a project the moment it is found to be violating the rules.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
cenzorrll@cenzorrll@piefed.ca
⁨24⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Yeah, saying outright that you can’t gives them the ability to remove a problematic project without issue. Otherwise, GiganticProject, that prints “hello world” and is used by Microsoft, which is a million lines of code with 100,000 lines committed every day can be removed without having to deal with Microsoft’s lawyers.

⁨Jul⁩ ⁨22⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨16:22⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs