Skip to main content
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

beep@beep@piefed.world
⁨1⁩mo

Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1399987/fable-5-1-solves-the-cyphral-distich-a-370-year-old-cipher

www.vals.ai/blogs/fable-solves-cyphral-distich
www.vals.aiVals AIPrivate, domain-specific benchmarks in legal, tax, and finance.
⁨Sep⁩ ⁨14⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨07:44⁩Edited ⁨⁨Sep⁩ ⁨14⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨08:31⁩⁩enPage
51016
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
_deleted_@_deleted_@aussie.zone
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

Now do the Voynich Manuscript.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
KiwiTB@KiwiTB@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

Did it… Or did they steal the solution from someone?

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
humanspiral@humanspiral@lemmy.ca
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨KiwiTB@lemmy.world⁩

Article goes into detail how it was solved, and why previous approaches failed. It does not appear to have stolen anyone else’s ideas.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub
⁨29⁩d

Replying to @⁨humanspiral@lemmy.ca⁩

It does not appear to have stolen anyone else’s ideas

By the nature of LLMs and how they work, stealing people’s ideas is all they do…

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
MadPsyentist@MadPsyentist@lemmy.nz
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

They probably scaned a manuscript from some unheard of eastern european mathmatician that wrote in some long forgoten Cyrilic “heres how you can work it out. Im going to leave working out the cypher as an excercise for the reader… Look, its a cypher, its easier to prove the math that solves it than it is to acctually solve it. Thats how cyphers work”

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
ryannathans@ryannathans@aussie.zone
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨MadPsyentist@lemmy.nz⁩

Can tell you didn’t even read it

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
inari@inari@piefed.zip
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to an earlier post

PR stunt

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
REDACTED@REDACTED@infosec.pub
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

From an independent researcher?

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
zbyte64@zbyte64@awful.systems
edited⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨REDACTED@infosec.pub⁩

You think the independent researcher spent their own money on tokens? Last time this hit the news it came out it took millions of dollars worth of token spend. Is this researcher a multi-millionaire?

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
REDACTED@REDACTED@infosec.pub
edited⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨zbyte64@awful.systems⁩

It was 45 minutes of Fable 5.1 thinking. Million tokens goes for something like 50 dollars. It really isn’t the type of money that bankrupts you.

EDIT: Those large bills are normally for programming jobs where AI can output thousands of lines.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
𝔳𝔢𝔩𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔬𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔰@velummortis@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨1⁩mo

Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

Yawn, waiting for Linear B

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs