Beau-coup

@MonKaiju@todon.nl @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @ludonaut@timetheft.rip @LabSpokane@mas.to if COMMUNISM ever WON, you would be one of the FIRST to be shot against a WALL.

@xz@ieji.de @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @ludonaut@timetheft.rip @LabSpokane@mas.to I'm glad you used very few words to say you're stupid.

@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @LabSpokane@mas.to @ludonaut@timetheft.rip the entire point of your COMMUNIST way of THINKING is to inflict harm. We have a FREE market, fuck off and head home to 1811 where Luddites still exist.

@jwz@mastodon.social here let me quote @beaucoup for you

communist filth must be destroyed
in a free marketplace of ideas I win
you suck

@silverpill@mitra.social @cavallette@mastodon.bida.im

If you spend those bitcoins in a way that is linked to your identity, donors will be exposed.

Would you say that the more Bitcoin is adopted, the less your identity will be exposed? Because people would to pay each other more in BTC. Or will more adoption mean more people using custodial services like exchanges? And in turn be caught off guard when their funds get frozen.

Also, if you spend them together, that would reveal that all addresses have the same owner

Monero beats Bitcoin there, but at a cost that makes hosting it more expensive, which lowers the grassroots adoption (people running nodes). I would accept the Bitcoin cost of pseudo anonymity, since I believe it's the path of least resistance in terms of avoiding a one world government.

@silverpill@mitra.social @cavallette@mastodon.bida.im

that would put donors at risk

What if you use BTCPayServer, so there's a new address for every transaction?
https://btcpayserver.org/