Replying to @⁨arotrios@lemmy.world⁩

There’s a greater entity that controls society that is beyond our political systems.

There will eventually be a purge of anyone that lacks a certain level of loyalty.

I wish there was a way I could articulate this without sounding crazy. Essentially look at gangstalking… There’s people telling the truth but the truth is purposely laced with controlled conspiracies to make the people that hold truths look crazy. Discernment of truth and conspiracy is key and it’s such a psychological mind fuck that even the people that are gangstalked get lost in it and eventually lose themselves.

This can’t be fixed by utilizing traditional methods our systems of politics are built upon. That’s not a call for action… But a call to understanding the gut wrenching reality of the situation. Because it seems like genuine authentic humanity is in checkmate.

In a way, it’s also kind of blatant if you look back at the past 10 years and how nothing seems to socially make sense in a natural organic human way. Like orchestrated social event planning to manipulate psychology to lead to a certain path. (Look into generations of warfare, specifically 5th and 6th iirc.) (*)

Something has humanity in the palms of its hands, and it’s completely detatched from any semblance of authentic natural law or “God”. …and like I said previously I believe it’s beyond what regular people perceive to be America, Democracy, and Government. It’s not simply about trump and the right, or the left anymore… That’s effectively a distraction. It also might be a transnational effort.

(*) Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is characterized by non-kinetic military actions such as misinformation, cyberattacks, and social engineering, focusing on manipulating information and perceptions rather than traditional combat. It represents a shift in warfare where the battlefield is often virtual and the adversaries are not always clearly defined.

Sixth-generation warfare (6GW) is a contested idea that focuses on targeting an opponent’s cognition—perception, belief, and decision-making—rather than just territory or networks. It is described as using artificial intelligence and autonomous systems across multiple domains (land, sea, air, cyber, and space) along with “cognitive operations” and algorithmic decision-making.

Replying to @⁨IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com⁩

I think what’s happening is everyone is operating entirely for their own self interest, and after awhile those interests start syncing up. So there’s no conscious conspiracy, but people are working together towards a common goal.

It would be more comforting if it were a conscious conspiracy, at least then there would be a goal set by conscious people. But I don’t think there is actually anyone at the wheel just all of the parts of a machine working together while we drive off a cliff.

Social media is definitely used to control people and yeah making people hate is the way they’re controlling people. But it’s a mess of foreign interests and moneyed interests. Foreign interests don’t want societal cohesion in their adversaries to weaken them. Moneyed interests don’t want cohesion so we can’t get it together enough to tax them and regulate their businesses. So they promote radicalization and demonization of centrists and disgusting politics on both the far right and far left to keep everyone divided.

Replying to @⁨IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com⁩

I think you’re on the wrong track. Reality is still immensely accessible to you if you go out in the world and critically check the information you’ve been given against the human reality out there.

Don’t lose yourself to the despair or confusion.

In a way, it’s also kind of blatant if you look back at the past 10 years and how nothing seems to socially make sense in a natural organic human way. Like orchestrated social event planning to manipulate psychology to lead to a certain path. (Look into generations of warfare, specifically 5th and 6th iirc.)

Plenty of things make social sense from the last 10 years in local communities, national contexts and international contexts. Both the good and the bad, e.g. a broad normalisation of LGBT and a backlash against it, progress in renewable energy and fights against different diseases, the rise of vaccine skeptics after COVID, the pandemic itself.

Or look at the “Ceuta crisis” in Europe. Images spread, right wing panic ensues, critical media investigates, it’s clear that the real situation is completely under control, the whole story becomes about an opportunistic right wing trying to create panic about immigration and left wing Spain.

All of this has played out in a natural, organic human way. Yes, social media has been a big, ugly shift in how communities work, and yes, they definitely work on purpose to simplify things that would previously die off most likely. But if you go outside and open your eyes, the world can make plenty of sense without some inhuman conspiracy beyond regular greed.

And please don’t say that anyone that disagrees with you are just victims of propaganda, that’s the ideal way to detach yourself from reality.

Replying to @⁨afterthewar@lemmus.org⁩

No, rather my suggestion is to start rooting yourself in the reality around you, understand the relationship between that reality and the media reporting on it, and then try to understand international events through that lense.

If certain media reports on things in your area in an unreasonable way, it might be that it’s a fundamentally unreasonable media. If some group’s messaging and ideology doesn’t match the reality you see around you, it might be a group detached from reality. Use these learnings to build critical thinking and find media and sources you can trust, or where you at least understand their angle and blind spots.

Of course, it does really help to see the situation around your own country and in other countries with your own eyes. Not everyone has that opportunity, but if you do, seize it, and talk to real people in the community.

Replying to an earlier post

From the article:

Hate, unfortunately, sells. Right-wing extremism researcher Kaz Ross told ABC that Meta’s “financial model is to reward content creators who get engagement, and as we know, the best way of getting engagement is to produce rage bait, extremist material, aggravating material: anything that will get people upset and arguing is the best way to get engagement.”

It’s another example of how quickly Meta dropped its once-stricter content moderation policies when Donald Trump returned to the White House. Shortly before his second inauguration, Meta loosened its standards around hate speech, particularly on topics like gender identity and immigration, two of the far right’s favorite issues.

Replying to @⁨iamthetot@piefed.ca⁩

It’s much bigger than just corporate ‘profits’ ! This is the US/western oligarch Class pushing the world to the brink of WW3, only because they are trying to hinder China and others from eclipsing them and thereby taking away the exorbitant power they have commanded for several hundred years, while colonizing and exploiting the world…

Meta and the Zuck are colluding with the US Epstein Class to manipulate the entire ‘western’ hemisphere of people where Meta/facebook are present.

This is psychopathy/manipulation on a civilizational scale, and the Zuck and all his Epstein buddies will need to pay the consequences of that at some point.

Replying to @⁨arotrios@lemmy.world⁩

The best kind of content for engagement is hate. You get users angrily defending both sides, stacks of comments, reposts (both in support of, and "OMG look at what they’re saying), the whole shebang.

Meta has learned that promotion of hate content pays off handsomely on those sweet sweet engagement metrics that shareholders love.

So of course they’re going to pay the hatemongers for content. Even when their own content policies ostensibly forbid it. Because that’s what makes line go up and they’ll do anything to keep that happening.

Replying to @⁨arotrios@lemmy.world⁩

Nazism have gotten a deliberate revival in the western information sphere.

We had the same celebration of Nazi c*nts in Canada, where Trudeau pulled out an old Ukrainian Nazi, and let him be paraded in their parliamentarian chambers - together with Zelensky oc.

If we go further back, we see that a throng of nazi’s from old Germany/Europe was saved/relocated and protected by the Western psycho Oligarchy, that was just waiting to trigger them again later.

We even see that many of the current unelected top EU elite have families that have close connections to this archaic and disgusting ideology, through parents, or grandparents.

We see techlords that have WAY to close connections, and families that openly express similar attitudes.

What is especially interesting, is that the situation in Ukraine was escalated by US through local Nazi groups that were also nurtured since 1990’ies by the US/CIA, and we see how Ukraine is controlled by Nazi groups today (they all have Bandera and Nazi signs everywhere and their nazi groups vocally confirms it despite being told to hide it now).

My bet is that Meta worked closely with US oligarchy, to manipulate the western population towards accepting nazi attitudes, as something more normal, and hopefully for them, nurture a new breed of nationalists ready to kill others for the Zuck and the Epsteins…

Replying to an earlier post

Now That Is What I Call A Headline

These pages and individual creators posted content that appeared to be in clear violation of Facebook’s own hate speech policies. Nonetheless, they were able to earn money on their posts through the platform’s “Content Monetization” program — which is invitation-only.

Meta should’ve been under no illusions about who they were paying to drive engagement on the platform.

Yet I’m sure that’s exactly what they claim. [insert South Park BP Oil Sorry meme]

BTW:

Facebook’s monetization program can be quite lucrative, though it’s unclear how much each of these pages made individually. In 2025, Facebook doled out nearly $3 billion to 16 million accounts, the reporting notes. The platform periodically discloses data on these monetized accounts, which has been collated into a searchable database by the tech accountability non-profit What to Fix.

www.monetization.wtfMeta Monetization Archive | AboutFind out more about the WHAT TO FIX Meta Monetization Archive, the data it's built on, and how it can be used to review Meta's monetization partnerships.

Replying to @⁨CosmoNova@lemmy.world⁩

Vasily Grossman, a Ukrainian Jew himself, wrote this after WW II on Jewish Nazi sympathizers and collaborators:

The violence of a totalitarian State is so great as to be no longer a means to an end; it becomes an object of mystical worship and adoration. How else can one explain the way certain intelligent, thinking Jews declared the slaughter of the Jews to be necessary for the happiness of mankind? That in view of this they were ready to take their own children to be executed - ready to carry out the sacrifice once demanded of Abraham?

Replying to @⁨arotrios@lemmy.world⁩

:sigh: I hate when people just tell outright lies for clicks.

Did bad people get money from Meta? Yes.

Did Meta actively pay bad people to post bad content? NO. This is like saying that Youtube had hired people to post AI videos targeting children because they pay people part of the advertising they sell on videos. It is not the same thing at all.

If a Walmart employee beats you up while they’re on the clock, these twits would post “WALMART HIRED AND PAID PEOPLE TO BEAT INNOCENT PEOPLE UP”.

Am I saying Meta is great? No1 Fuck you no! But is this headline bullshit? YES IT IS.