PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
Andrew Nesbitt@andrewnez@mastodon.social
⁨11⁩d

https://github.com/chaoss/disclosure is proving to be a very useful tool in analysing disclosure of ai contributions to oss projects.

Github Action to gather signals of disclosed AI contribution to aid community health monitoring tools and open source maintainers - chaoss/disclosureGitHubGitHub - chaoss/disclosure: Github Action to gather signals of disclosed AI contribution to aid community health monitoring tools and open source maintainersGithub Action to gather signals of disclosed AI contribution to aid community health monitoring tools and open source maintainers - chaoss/disclosure
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Pelle Wessman@voxpelli.com@bsky.brid.gy
⁨11⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Reminds me of eg. usagescale.org, we need ways to disclose AI usage in a nuanced and informative ways.

Eg: Was the AI used for code review? For test generation? For tech spec implementation? Or for full on autonomous vibe coding?

The AI Usage Manifesto — AI Us...

A free, open scale for saying how a work was made — whose knowledge it carries and who stands behind it. Six levels. Thirty seconds. No committee to ask.AI Usage ScaleThe AI Usage Manifesto — AI Usage ScaleA free, open scale for saying how a work was made — whose knowledge it carries and who stands behind it. Six levels. Thirty seconds. No committee to ask.
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Andrew Nesbitt@andrewnez@mastodon.social
⁨11⁩d

Replying to @⁨voxpelli.com@bsky.brid.gy⁩

@voxpelli.com ugh the ai language throughout that page, did the author even read it before publishing? looks like a level 4 to me, not a level 3

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨4⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨19:02⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs