Skip to main content
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

Beep@Beep@feddit.online
⁨13⁩h

More than 400 scientists demand AI models be cut off from the internet immediately and demand a more secure sandboxing for AI models

cross-posted from: https://feddit.online/c/tech@piefed.world/p/2029056/406-scientists-demand-ai-models-be-cut-off-from-the-internet-immediately-and-demand-a-m

ai-security-letter.org/
410304
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
NoLemurs@NoLemurs@lemmy.world
⁨13⁩h

Replying to @⁨Beep@feddit.online⁩

This is stupid. Open-weight models that can largely do what the OpenAI/Anthropic models did are already out in the wild.

Do these people not understand that you can’t put the cat back in the bag?

4000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
⁨12⁩h

Replying to @⁨NoLemurs@lemmy.world⁩

It’s not at all stupid, because there’s no such thing as a “rogue agent,” only rogue users of AI. With proper airgapping, there’s no such thing as a “rogue agent.”

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
aksdb@aksdb@lemmy.world
⁨7⁩h

Replying to @⁨lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world⁩

But isn’t that the problem? You can’t force a rogue user to do anything; or they wouldn’t be rogue. So why should they apply air gapping to their agents?

⁨Oct⁩ ⁨15⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨17:01⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Dave.@dgriffith@aussie.zone
⁨3⁩h

Replying to @⁨aksdb@lemmy.world⁩

So why should they apply air gapping to their agents?

Because if they don’t, they could face jail time personally or their company is fined to death? That’s how you apply corrective pressure to those thinking about “going rogue”.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs