Replying to @kokomo@reddit.kokomo.cloud
Brilliant!
How does it go for chewing thru the phone battery tho?

Replying to @kokomo@reddit.kokomo.cloud
Brilliant!
How does it go for chewing thru the phone battery tho?
Replying to @blargh513@sh.itjust.works
I had no idea you could do that.
How is battery affected by having home assistant on phone? Does it need to be foregrounded?
Replying to @A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
Nope, not me. The article popped up in my feed, I commented on it (over on /c/rtfa) and then shared if here. Feel free to check.
Replying to @doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de
For context, that comes for the HN thread and blog post, not from anything I have written. Let’s attribute things to respective sources :)
Replying to a post on lemmy.myserv.one
Dunno if you can do this with ipads, but I’ve been (idly) considering using old phones to create an Alfred camera system
Probably not…but it’s a fun idea.
alfred.cameraAlfredCamera | Simple Security at Your FingertipsTurn your old phone into a wireless security camera with this top-rated app, trusted by 70,000,000 worldwide. The AlfredCamera app is compatible with Android and iOS devices, as well as PCs with webcams. It also works seamlessly with AlfredCam, our first indoor security camera.posted in Selfhosted
[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content
Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn’t returned to follow community rules.
Here’s the original topic news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386
and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)
マリウス.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/
It’s a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don’t self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer
Replying to @innocentz3r0@programming.dev
That’s nice and clean…and I love that you have both random fact and XKCD. Too many front ends look like a space shuttle launch control; this one has soul
Replying to @deacon@lemmy.world
Yo ho, all together, hoist the colors high
Heave ho, thieves and beggars
Never shall we die
Replying to @pandasiusfilet@feddit.org
You love to see it.
Self identifying as the baddy makes my life easier.
Samsung, Apple, LG - who’s next? Speak up, please.
Self-hosting, data sovereignty and cyberattacks [AIT]
If you follow AI news at all as part of your self-hosting interests, you may have become aware recently that open AI (the frontier lab between behind chat GPT) has admitted (loosely) culpability in an cyber attack against HuggingFace (the major repository of open-weight models.)
The details that present are somewhat sketchy, but the gist of it is that open AI seems to have given unrestricted access to a AI agent, which then attacked hugging face, who in a twist of deliciousness, used an open source agent to defend themselves.
I’d joke and tell you to make sure that you haven’t left any open ports on your router, but if you’re here reading this I think probably you know better than that.
Less comically, there’s a weird intersection here between self-hosting, sovereignty and encroachment by big tech that is worth pay attention to.
It should certainly spur people on to seriously consider self-hosting as much of their infrastructure as they can (and securing it) if this is the preview of things to come.
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
I just wish I’d bought more SSDs.
lemmy.worldOpenAI admits responsibility for HuggingFace Attack - an agent from an internal evaluation is reportedly the cause - Lemmy.WorldReproducing here an interesting comment I saw on Reddit: > OnlineParacosm • 23m
ago > > I’ve read security disclosures for 15 years and let me tell you guys
I’ve never read anything quite like that blog post. > > Based on this blog, it
sounds like they intentionally turned off safety guardrails to test offensive
capabilities. The deception here is burying the lede: they appear to have
intentionally unleashed an unrestricted offensive cyber-agent, connected it to a
system with a path to the internet, and it immediately attacked a major partner.
The blog glosses over the gross negligence of giving an autonomous, unrestricted
cyber-offense model a pathway to lateral movement. > > There’s an entire
cybersecurity specialization just for just vendor supply chain risk assessment,
and their job is essentially to audit who you do business with as a company to
determine if they are jokers. I would pay money to be a fly on the wall of one
of those emergency meetings taking place right now after h