SuspiciousCarrot78

@SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone · Joined ⁨May⁩ ⁨2026⁩

Replying to @⁨SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone⁩

Yeah…this Circlus thing has a particular odor to it. Knew it was too good to be true.

I’m going to fork Simple LAN Chat and add what I want: https://github.com/nathanielxd/simple-lan-chat

It’s serverless, which is one less thing to host. Text chat already works. The main problems are broken image/file transfer (literally craps itself with anything about 5kb) and no useful notifications. So I will fix those, then probably add offline message queuing.

Replying to @⁨SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone⁩

Aw crap, I may have awakened something in me…like hosting another bloody service the kids will use once and then just quit. No amount of my over-engineering can solve user apathy…so this time I’m investing less effort :)

Interestingly…the local brain found these

github.com/nathanielxd/simple-lan-chat

f-droid.org/…/net.usikkert.kouchat.android/

I still kinda wanna do the XMPP thing now…but I have a nagging suspicion I will be talking to myself or the clanker with it.

A simple app that allows users on the same LAN to chat through basic UDP packets. - nathanielxd/simple-lan-chatGitHubGitHub - nathanielxd/simple-lan-chat: A simple app that allows users on the same LAN to chat through basic UDP packets.A simple app that allows users on the same LAN to chat through basic UDP packets. - nathanielxd/simple-lan-chat

posted in Selfhosted

Circlus messenger?

Right - ran a search and got no results, so am asking directly

This thing any good? Anyone run it?

circlus.org

Use case: want to give my kid a SEVERELY locked down Moto E (2nd gen) as a Youtube music player device and a “message Daddy” app - strictly wifi / in house only.

The first thing is simple enough. The second thing is…interesting.

I had my local AI do some research and it spat out the above. I don’t think it’s quite right but It looks interesting. Any one use it / can comment? Failing that, can anyone recommend a simple WLAN messaging app that will run on Android 6 / lineageOS? I’m sure I can dig one up but if someone has one running, I’m all ears.

PS: I’m not looking at using a VPS for this…but the above did catch my attention as fairly normie friendly. Might be worth self hosting something like that…

circlus.orgCirclus — Your Private MessengerCirclus is a private messenger for trusted circles, with self-hosted servers, end-to-end encrypted chats, calls, and transparent server ownership.

posted in Selfhosted

What's your favourite thing to self host and why?

Topic per title, basically.

For me: after setting up all the integrations and fall overs using the arr stack and Jellyfin (inc Sabnzdb etc)… I keep circling back to Nova video player.

github.com/nova-video-player/aos-AVP/releases

It’s arguably not even self hosting…but there something undeniably cool about sticking a USB stick into a router, installing a single app on your TV and boom, done. EDIT: of course, it can consume the *arr stack, integrate with Ombi etc

IOW, I really like stuff that simple to set up and punches above its weight class.

NOVA opeN sOurce Video plAyer: main repository to build them all - nova-video-player/aos-AVPGitHubReleases · nova-video-player/aos-AVPNOVA opeN sOurce Video plAyer: main repository to build them all - nova-video-player/aos-AVP

Replying to a post on ⁨lemmy.myserv.one⁩

Dunno if you can do this with ipads, but I’ve been (idly) considering using old phones to create an Alfred camera system

alfred.camera

Probably not…but it’s a fun idea.

alfred.cameraAlfredCamera | Simple Security at Your FingertipsTurn your old phone into a wireless security camera with this top-rated app, trusted by 70,000,000 worldwide. The AlfredCamera app is compatible with Android and iOS devices, as well as PCs with webcams. It also works seamlessly with AlfredCam, our first indoor security camera.

posted in Selfhosted

[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content

Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn’t returned to follow community rules.

Here’s the original topic news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

マリウス.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It’s a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don’t self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

news.ycombinator.comCodeberg bans vibe coded projects | Hacker News

Self-hosting, data sovereignty and cyberattacks [AIT]

lemmy.world/post/49736885

If you follow AI news at all as part of your self-hosting interests, you may have become aware recently that open AI (the frontier lab between behind chat GPT) has admitted (loosely) culpability in an cyber attack against HuggingFace (the major repository of open-weight models.)

The details that present are somewhat sketchy, but the gist of it is that open AI seems to have given unrestricted access to a AI agent, which then attacked hugging face, who in a twist of deliciousness, used an open source agent to defend themselves.

I’d joke and tell you to make sure that you haven’t left any open ports on your router, but if you’re here reading this I think probably you know better than that.

Less comically, there’s a weird intersection here between self-hosting, sovereignty and encroachment by big tech that is worth pay attention to.

It should certainly spur people on to seriously consider self-hosting as much of their infrastructure as they can (and securing it) if this is the preview of things to come.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

I just wish I’d bought more SSDs.

lemmy.worldOpenAI admits responsibility for HuggingFace Attack - an agent from an internal evaluation is reportedly the cause - Lemmy.WorldReproducing here an interesting comment I saw on Reddit: > OnlineParacosm • 23m ago > > I’ve read security disclosures for 15 years and let me tell you guys I’ve never read anything quite like that blog post. > > Based on this blog, it sounds like they intentionally turned off safety guardrails to test offensive capabilities. The deception here is burying the lede: they appear to have intentionally unleashed an unrestricted offensive cyber-agent, connected it to a system with a path to the internet, and it immediately attacked a major partner. The blog glosses over the gross negligence of giving an autonomous, unrestricted cyber-offense model a pathway to lateral movement. > > There’s an entire cybersecurity specialization just for just vendor supply chain risk assessment, and their job is essentially to audit who you do business with as a company to determine if they are jokers. I would pay money to be a fly on the wall of one of those emergency meetings taking place right now after h