While I don’t use LLMs, IMHO unreviewed code is unreviewed code. If it’s unreviewed, that means no one has taken responsibility for it, and so it doesn’t belong in any codebase without that giant disclaimer front and center.
Edit: lol @ downvoters who “vibe-read” this comment 🤦 the toxic element of lemmy who think we can’t see who they are
While I don’t use LLMs, IMHO unreviewed code is unreviewed code. If it’s unreviewed, that means no one has taken responsibility for it, and so it doesn’t belong in any codebase without that giant disclaimer front and center.
Edit: lol @ downvoters who “vibe-read” this comment 🤦
Butting in to say: you’re more charitable than most. These days it seems like having a simple Bayesian/heuristic comment validator installed is enough to call a codebase “vibe coded” (read: silly overreactive moralisms).
While I don’t use LLMs for code generation personally (yet), IMHO unreviewed code is unreviewed code. It’s no better or worse for being written by a junior learning the ropes, a senior beanbag coder, or the hottest frontier mix of experts.
If it’s unreviewed, that means no one has taken responsibility for it, and so it doesn’t belong in any codebase without that giant disclaimer front and center.
Edit: lol @ downvoters who “vibe-read” this comment 🤦
Butting in to say: you’re more charitable than most. These days it seems like having a simple Bayesian/heuristic comment validator installed is enough to call a codebase “vibe coded” (read: silly overreactive moralisms).
While I don’t use LLMs for code generation personally (yet), IMHO unreviewed code is unreviewed code. It’s no better or worse for being written by a junior learning the ropes, a senior beanbag coder, or the hottest frontier mix of experts.
If it’s unreviewed, that means no one has taken responsibility for it, and so it doesn’t belong in any codebase without that giant disclaimer front and center.