posted in Technology
Engineer says Claude Code has made his job "soul-sucking" as workers spend 12-hour days pressing enter
www.techspot.com/news/113937-engineer-claude-code-has-made-job-soul-sucking.htmlposted in Technology
Engineer says Claude Code has made his job "soul-sucking" as workers spend 12-hour days pressing enter
www.techspot.com/news/113937-engineer-claude-code-has-made-job-soul-sucking.htmlReplying to @Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club
I’ve heard the same from developers at work “doing this using AI makes it boring, but at the same time I feel silly if I write everything from scratch”.
Replying to @espentan@lemmy.world
I’m not a developer but I do make little tools for myself at work. I used an LLM to assist with adding some features recently, nothing I couldn’t easily do myself. It did a fine job and made minimal changes, all totally readable and for the most part the same way I would have done it.
I have a new tool I want to make, and it’s hard not to just turn to the LLM, since it’ll save me many hours on a script that nobody else will ever see. It’s really taken the fun out of it. I’m proud of what I made, even though nobody else will care, but doing this my usual way will feel like I’m using the wrong tool out of perversity.
I dunno. I hate everything.
Replying to @clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
I look at it this way: if you prompted an LLM to generate it, then you didn’t “do” it, you basically installed an outside piece of software that just happened to be generated on-the-fly.
Replying to @RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
That maybe true if youre single shotting. At some point, but that’s rarely the end. It takes iteration and experience to get LLMs to do useful work in most cases.