posted in Technology

Flock Surveillance Cameras Are Actually Horrible for Fighting Crime, FBI Data Shows

futurism.com/future-society/flock-surveillance-atlanta-fbi-data-crime-case-solve
FuturismFlock Surveillance Cameras Are Actually Horrible for Fighting Crime, FBI Data ShowsNew FBI data shows case closure rates for the Atlanta Police Department have not improved despite thousands of ALPRs installed since 2021.

Replying to @⁨T156@lemmy.world⁩

Anything that would do meaningful damage to a camera sensor will easily to that to human eyeballs if it refracts or gets reflected.

I don’t think that’s true? The lidars on Waymo have been known to damage camera sensors but are safe to the eyes. By damage, like a pixel or two go out, but that’s from a random hit. If you did it right you could do more damage.

Edited ⁨⁨Aug⁩ ⁨3⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨02:02⁩⁩en

Replying to @⁨T156@lemmy.world⁩

This says its about the specific wave lengths and our eyes are okay with the ones bad for cameras

www.faceofit.com/lidar-camera-sensor-damage/

If I hadn’t heard of this happening before though I wouldn’t have guessed this to be the case.

Faces of ITLiDAR & Camera Sensor Damage: How Lasers Can Destroy Your PhoneLearn why "eye-safe" automotive LiDAR from self-driving cars can permanently damage your smartphone or DSLR camera sensor. Understand the risks and how to protect your gear.