Replying to @Karcsesz@equestria.social
re: ranty, KDE, DDH, big tech
@Karcsesz mhm, its multipart; directed at you suggesting its perfectly fine if ""they deserve it"" .. thats not principals, its random authoritative bullshit based on whatever you think about something
i dont disagree with 'dont witchhunt' my issue is* specifically* that any instance of people taking issue about AI, or critiquing someones actions or thoughts is seen as 'infighting'; i cant critique say FOSS, for using AI,
i dont see it as a 'witch hunt' i see it as a bunch of individual actions of someone critiquing a thing, or talking about somthing being harmful, is not something id even consider harmful at all- and is an important part of harm reduciton,
collectively, when alot of people do that, it might kind of turn into something 'harmful', but its; not some coordinated attack
for context; this post was a quick rant, primarily about their insistence on 'nuance' being the best thing;
https://tech.lgbt/@Li/117321952720406143
here is a more uh in-depth answer i wrote later; uh
Li ~ Crystal System@Li@tech.lgbt@hsza @drakulix @Elizafox we live in a soceity where working at all is pretty much working in tech at all is pretty close to working for the torment nexus; and where the best "well paying" jobs are also the more terrible ones.. and i do* think there is something here
like leftist infighting sure, but i also dont see a way to avoid leftist "infighting" that allows for correcting them or othwewise still calling them out when their doing something wrong;
because um thats important too and i dont know a way to do so because doing so gets intepreted as "infighting" and when a bunch want to do that over the same issue its a "mob"
that said id like to avoid a "because i dont have a solution to this particular problem it doesnt count" situation too