PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today
⁨2⁩d

AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?

www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/13/ai-agents-arent-legally-responsible-for-any-harm-that-they-cause-experts-say-so-who-is
3310378
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
LilBobbyTables@LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

The people who use it to do things, obviously. Just like how cameras aren’t responsible for the photos that are taken with them, photoshop isn’t responsible for the images made with it, and knives aren’t responsible for the things that they cut, AI isn’t responsible for the stuff it outputs - the person controlling it is.

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Darkonion@Darkonion@lemmy.world
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

If someone sells you a knife that routinely fires bullets, then the company may have some complicity as with any misrepresented product.

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨13⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨11:59⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
LilBobbyTables@LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

But in that analogy, the knife routinely asks you to confirm if you want to fire bullets or not.

AI does nothing without people telling it what to do, and giving it permission to do it.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs