
Avicenna
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
There is no question that this violates doctor patient confidentiality and damages trust. Fuck no. Even if they fucking have to not take off their clothes NO.
Replying to @FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
The problem is not inherit to AI. The problem is with the people who own the tech and it will much worse if they also own a more efficient version of it. Not that it seems like an immediate threat and I am not even starting to consider the ethical problems with this.
I mean really the same problem with Monarchy. Once someone somehow gets on top very hard to remove them and their descendants from power even if the original person or their descendants are complete idiots.
Replying to @magnue@lemmy.world
yeah same here, the worst it can do is get in some weird loops to resolve an issue which can normally be resolved by better prompting or pointing it in the correct direction. But it is pretty good with file handling and usage of temp folder. I usually let it do auto but ask it not to implement anything before having a discussion with me so it generally does stuff in scratchpads in temp. One thing annoying about Claude is though when you open the session in a folder to work on a small script it generally goes as “ok let me read everything recursively staring from four parents up to get the context.” Probably can be handled with better config files but I just generally handle couple of initial request manually and then once it is in analysis mode I let it go auto
Replying to @Blackmist@feddit.uk
Yes but we still don’t have ones that swoon over thirst traps repeatedly.
Replying to @FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
The solution? Flood Facebook with AI generated boomers and let the bot system implode and take facebook down with it.
Replying to @inari@piefed.zip
I only donate from time to time but people who cancel recurring donations should write to them the reason as to why.
Replying to @motruck@lemmy.zip
We should also mention he probably gained lots of money from low hanging non-ethical fruits like illegally providing user data to companies that analyse political motivations.
Replying to @vegeta@lemmy.world
Steals an idea to get rich. Buys companies to produce ideas for him but still fails somehow. Gets called innovative genius because he has lots of money? I guess all he is that he was opportunistic and was able to realize a good idea (perhaps by chance) a long time ago and stole it. Now he is constantly failing on choosing good ideas but because he is stinking rich he is somehow able to keep himself afloat.
Replying to @artifex@piefed.social
how much hype are you going to milk from something that could have been stopped with ctrl c
yes but…money please?
