zbyte64

I find this kind of response insufferable. It shifts the conversation from a systems critique to personal responsibility. You could have posted this in response the OP, and it would be equally on point and useless.

I have personalized ads turned of in YouTube and it seems half the ads are for gambling as of late.

And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?

Being critAI is being proAI.

Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn

And if we had universal healthcare it would actually be cheaper to produce those cars. Canada is proof of this.

Because it would be immensely stupid

Maybe we can’t but climate change could.

Talk about a loss for all those who voted for irresponsible use of AI /s

This is what share holder value looks like.

Thank you for explaining that to me and expressing how you feel.

If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.

That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?

That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.

Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on “perceived value”? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, “yes, and”

That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.

I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?

We can simply build the tech then throw the billionaires out.

We did that with the fediverse but the billionaires still control the online conversation.

You’ll be able to interact with your agent through any device, including your glasses to keep you present in the moment with the people you care about.

The guy still thinks his pervert glasses is a product we want. There isn’t a single original thought under that perm of his.

They do have billionaires, but they aren’t calling the shots. Just ask Jack Ma