Replying to @hrast@sunny.garden
@hrast @GrapheneOS @darkwolf fun fact even, cops solve less case since mass surveillance than before due to the massive amount of false positive.
True Sovereinty advocate, Privacy Advocate, Security advocate
Replying to @hrast@sunny.garden
@hrast @GrapheneOS @darkwolf fun fact even, cops solve less case since mass surveillance than before due to the massive amount of false positive.
Replying to @MonKaiju@todon.nl
@MonKaiju @GrapheneOS @ludonaut yeah you are right i will correct it, my native language we use QI (quotient intellectuelle (belgian french)) instead of IQ thanks to pointing out my mistake 👍
Replying to @Dawnexa@fosstodon.org
@Dawnexa @Lightfighter @GrapheneOS don't like AI, but sadly now the genie is out the box, and we cannot put it back.
so the only "thing" we can do without allowing the bad guy to win... is to force those company to develop the next generation to be less and less "bad" for humanity and the market.
Sadly right now due to a pedophile Orange child in the white house they do anything they want without any check on them.
Replying to @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
@GrapheneOS @ludonaut but funny how certain asshole, immediately label you nazi because you simply state a fact that Security = AI + human.
If we put all those people with a negative IQ in orbit, we would not see the sun anymore.
Edit : corrected QI into IQ (translation mistake), thanks matt.
Replying to @ludonaut@timetheft.rip
@ludonaut @GrapheneOS They CANNOT stop. That's not an opinion, it's a fact of running anything security-critical. If you genuinely believe otherwise, then by all means, join their security team for $200 a month and show us all how it's done, analyzing every line of code that lands on their desk with the same output as an AI. Until you're willing to do that, repeating the same flawed argument isn't helping anyone.
Replying to @LabSpokane@mas.to
@LabSpokane @GrapheneOS @ludonaut
They CANNOT stop. That's not an opinion, it's a fact of running anything security-critical. If you genuinely believe otherwise, then by all means, join their security team for $200 a month and show us all how it's done, analyzing every line of code that lands on their desk with the same output as an AI. Until you're willing to do that, repeating the same flawed argument isn't helping anyone.
Replying to @Lightfighter@infosec.exchange
@Lightfighter @GrapheneOS yes on one side the pro AI sicko, who think it's a god who will solve everything.
and on the other side the Anti AI sicko who see it as anti Christ who will destroy everything.
With us normal people in the middle.