The text is what makes it valuable though? I guess there’s some value in, like, the actual literal physical copy too, but that has nothing to do with rarity. A bible can have historical value because of who owned it, but that’d be strange to describe as “rare” I think.
Edit history
It’s text is what makes it valuable as a historical object? I guess there’s some value in, like, the actual physical book too, but that has nothing to do with rarity. A bible can have historical value too, but it’s not rare is it?