← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

I’m not going to argue against your conclusion, I strongly believe we do not have anything resembling human consciousness in software yet.

But Penrose was definitely not proven right (unless you’re talking about black holes), nor was the Orch OR theory about microtubules proven, nor was consciousness proven to be a quantum phenomenon. Here’s an easy, accessible article that goes over the state of the research: breezyscroll.com/…/new-quantum-evidence-is-reopen…

Edited

I’m not going to argue against your conclusion, I strongly believe we do not have anything resembling human consciousness in software yet.

But Penrose was definitely not proven right, his theories are kind of ridiculous, nor was the Orch OR theory about microtubules proven, nor was consciousness proven to be a quantum phenomenon. Here’s an easy, accessible article that goes over the state of the research: breezyscroll.com/…/new-quantum-evidence-is-reopen…

Original

I’m not going to argue against your conclusion, I strongly believe we do not have anything resembling human consciousness in software yet.

But Penrose was definitely not proven right, his theories are kind of ridiculous, nor was the Orch OR theory about microtubules proven, nor was consciousness proven to be a quantum. Here’s an easy, accessible article that goes over the state of the research: breezyscroll.com/…/new-quantum-evidence-is-reopen…