Since the 1980s everyone called him crazy because obviously quantum entanglement can’t exist in a brain…
We recently found out that’s not difficult, and even superposition is possible.
We know that anesthesia breaks up those microtubules and breaks superposition…
And we know that anesthesia stops consciousness…
But we don’t “know” the actual method of action of anesthesia because it’s not proven.
Like, I understand what kind of rigors you’re trying to apply here, but if everyone did what you’re doing wed have to pretend gravity isn’t real too.
If you think only proven things are “real” you don’t even fucking understand what the words you’re using mean in a scientific context.
Edit:
What even is your alternative?
-
Quantum superposition is in the brain
-
Neurons alone don’t explain consciousness
-
Interrupting superposition interrupts consciousness
C: we know there’s no quantum component of consciousness.
None of that makes sense, to the point I’m confident you don’t know how basic logic works, or what most of these words even mean…