Replying to @stermy4u@lemmy.world
Turns out the biggest miracle wasn’t multiplying loaves, it was making authentication disappear. An IDOR this basic on an app handling personal data is embarrassing. 🙈
Hi! 👋 I’m Gerrit and in love with the Internet since 1994. 💞 Media ▹ Communication 👨🔬 Entrepreneur & Consultant at eicker® [iCare] ⏻ Reinschauen: eicker.TV 📲 Get in touch! 📇🇩🇪🇬🇧 #Fedizen #AI #Tech #Media #Sovereignty
Replying to @stermy4u@lemmy.world
Turns out the biggest miracle wasn’t multiplying loaves, it was making authentication disappear. An IDOR this basic on an app handling personal data is embarrassing. 🙈
Replying to @jj4211@lemmy.world
It’s even worse! SpaceX includes XAi and XTwitter: cash burning nonsense. The only good thing about SpaceX is Starlink.
Replying to @Joelk111@lemmy.world
I’m a huge fan of the Fediverse, but the barriers are so incredibly high that it’s unlikely a large number of people - let alone a majority - will find their way here.
Replying to @Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Isn’t he just talking to bots there anyway, who can’t buy shares?
Replying to @712@discuss.tchncs.de
Perfect shouldn’t become the enemy of better. Open Weight AI isn’t Open Source AI, but it’s a huge improvement over Closed AI where you get neither the weights nor the training pipeline.
Replying to @PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
The irony is that platforms spent years making anonymity optional, then built engagement systems that rewarded the worst actors anyway. Now the proposed fix is more identity, more biometric data and more addictive UX.
Replying to @Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Ultimately, everyone, because associations, clubs and small towns are mainly or exclusively active on Facebook: anyone who wants to take part will still have to use Facebook. 🤷
Replying to @stermy4u@lemmy.world
They didn’t short rockets: They shorted Elon Musk’s promise machine. For years he’s sold investors a never ending stream of revolutionary breakthroughs that were always just around the corner. Eventually reality catches up. Even the world’s best engineers can’t justify a valuation built on perpetual hype instead of consistently delivered results.
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
Wall Street spent years pricing Tesla like a future AI empire instead of a car company. Now investors are getting a reminder that robotaxis, humanoids and promises don’t magically pay today’s bills. Reality has an annoying habit of showing up right after earnings season.
Replying to @Crumpled6273@lemmy.ca
More and fresh is better.
Zuck seems to be trying to boost his data for the facial recognition feature on Meta glasses. 🙈
posted in Technology
Meta launches new Facebook Verified badge for actual, real humans
www.engadget.com/2222353/meta-launches-facebook-verified/
EngadgetMeta launches new Facebook Verified badge for actual, real humans - EngadgetMeta is trying to tackle scammers that are using generative AI by introducing a new kind of verification using user selfies.Replying to @eicker@lemmy.world
That is indeed an important distinction. However, I expect that it will be a very long time before we see any competitive open-source AI.
Replying to @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
OpenAI is a good reminder that mission statements and business incentives don’t always stay aligned. That said, I’d judge DeepSeek less by the rhetoric and more by what they actually release. Hype is cheap: open weights, reproducible results and useful tools are much harder to fake.
Replying to @TheFogan@programming.dev
This. The frontier race is about building the smartest generalist, but most companies don’t need that. They need a specialist tuned to their workflows. Narrower scope means smaller models, lower costs, faster inference and often better results. General models become the foundation, not the finished product. It’s still all to play for! 💪😎✌️
Replying to @eicker@lemmy.world
That’s either incredibly idealistic or a very smart strategy: Open models grow ecosystems faster than walled gardens, but compute still decides who gets to play at the highest level. If AGI really becomes shared infrastructure, the moat shifts from models to chips, data and execution.
posted in Technology
DeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng Breaks His Silence: In a rare four-hour talk, the reclusive founder reveals an almost Daoist philosophy of AI—AGI as a tide no company can own...
www.fredgao.com/p/deepseeks-liang-wenfeng-breaks-his
www.fredgao.comDeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng Breaks His SilenceIn a rare four-hour talk, the reclusive founder reveals an almost Daoist philosophy of AI—AGI as a tide no company can own, he argues China's only real gap with America is compute.Replying to @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
You’re mixing two separate issues: A sandbox escape is evidence the containment failed, not proof the model permanently learned from stolen data. If OpenAI later trained on exfiltrated material that would be a serious allegation, but that requires evidence. Otherwise it’s fair to criticise the security failure without assuming facts that have not been shown.
Replying to @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
That’s assuming security is something you solve once. It isn’t. Every security system is built by humans, tested by humans, and eventually bypassed by humans. We don’t abandon operating systems because vulnerabilities exist: we patch them, improve them, and layer defenses. AI changes the pace, not the fundamental nature of cybersecurity.
Replying to @eicker@lemmy.world
It was just as you’d expect: This isn’t an AI problem! It’s the same human problem we’ve always had: misconfigurations, weak security, and avoidable mistakes. AI just punishes those errors faster and more effectively than traditional software ever could. Anyone who continues to rest will be severely punished.