← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

I’d wager people like linux devs will learn exactly how unreliable they are, quickly, once they start using them. Its kind of impossible to miss.

There’s a chance some devs succumb to AI psychosis, but that’s why these large open source projects are institutionalized. No one person can ruin them, by design.

As for ethics, I think the open weights LLMs are far more ethical, albeit far from perfect. They’re trained modestly, presented as tools, apache licensed, self host able, more efficient to run, and good enough; people just need to know they exist as an alternative.

Edited

I’d wager people like linux devs will learn exactly how unreliable they are, quickly, once they start using them. Its kind of impossible to miss.

There’s a chance some devs succumb to AI psychosis, but that’s why these large open source projects are institutionalized. No one person can ruin them, by design.

As for ethics, I think the open weights LLMs are far more ethical. They’re trained modestly, presented as tools, apache licensed, self host able, more efficient to run, and good enough; people just need to know they exist as an alternative

Edited

I’d wager people like linux devs will learn exactly how unreliable they are, quickly, once they start using them enough. Its kind of impossible to miss.

There’s a chance some devs succumb to AI psychosis, but that’s why these large open source projects are institutionalized. No one person can ruin them, by design.

As for ethics, I think the open weights LLMs are far more ethical. They’re trained modestly, presented as tools, apache licensed, self host able, more efficient to run, and good enough; people just need to know they exist as an alternative

Edited

I’d wager people like linux devs will learn exactly how unreliable they are, quickly, once they start using them enough. Its kind of impossible to miss.

There’s a chance some devs succumb to AI psychosis, but that’s why these large open source projects are institutionalized. No one person can ruin them, by design.

As for ethics, I think the open weights LLMs are far more ethical. They’re trained modestly, presented as tools, apache licensed, mire efficient to run, and good enough; people just need to know they exist as an alternative

Original

I’d wager people like linux devs will learn exactly how unreliable they are, quickly, once they start using them enough. Its kind of impossible to miss.

There’s a chance some devs might succumb to AI psychosis, but that’s why these large open source projects are institutionalized.

As for ethics, I think the open weights LLMs are far more ethical. They’re trained modestly, presented as tools, apache licensed, mire efficient to run, and good enough; people just need to know they exist as an alternative