← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with what OpenAI needs? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine. In fact, OSX is often the first target platform.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing “AI” on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. They’re doing everything in OSX, which works fine, and I can’t imagine what OpenAI would be doing with them that wouldn’t work in OSX.

But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here. And I’m sorry to come off as thorny, but condescending comments like “I’m not here to teach a computer science class” rub me the wrong way.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with what OpenAI needs? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine. In fact, OSX is often the first target platform.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing “AI” on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. They’re doing everything in OSX, which works fine, and I can’t imagine what OpenAI would be doing with them that wouldn’t work in OSX.

But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here. And I’m sorry to come off as thorny, but condescending comments like “I’m not here to teach a computer science class” rub me the wrong way.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with what OpenAI needs? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine. In fact, OSX is often the first target platform.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. And they’re doing everything in OSX, which works fine.

But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here. And I’m sorry to come off as thorny here, but condescending statements like “I’m not here to teach a computer science class” rub me the wrong way.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with what OpenAI needs? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. And they’re doing everything in OSX, which works fine.

But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here. And I’m sorry to come off as thorny here, but condescending statements like “I’m not here to teach a computer science class” rub me the wrong way.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with AI? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. And they’re doing everything in OSX, which works fine.

But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here. And I’m sorry to come off as thorny here, but condescending statements like “I’m not here to teach a computer science class” rub me the wrong way.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with AI? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. And they’re doing everything in OSX, which works fine.

But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with AI? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here.

Edited

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with AI? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks are just python, or open code that can compile on OSX Macs just fine.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here.

Original

No, gaming is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with AI? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks are just python, or open code that can compile on OSX Macs just fine.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing AI on Macs is using Rosetta. There’s no point, and its a bad idea. But maybe I’m missing what you’re implying here.