Edit history

Okay.

I don’t agree. But let’s say I agree.

…Just don’t use Claude?

Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.

In other words, if one is going to try to hide automated writing, I think there should be a bare minimum effort to do so. That includes:

• Reading/checking the text, to see if it makes any sense.

• Actually trying to pass it as human.

90% of slop is brain melting slop because this minimum bar isn’t even met. And all Claude’s watermark would do is catch that bottom of the barrel; it wouldn’t censor anyone.

Okay.

I don’t agree. But let’s say I agree.

…Just don’t use Claude?

Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.

In other words, if one is going to try to hide automated writing, I think there should be a bare minimum effort to do so. That includes:

• Reading/checking the text, to see if it makes any sense.

• Actually trying to pass it as human.

90% of AI slop is brain melting crap because this minimum bar isn’t even met.

Okay.

I don’t agree. But let’s say I agree.

…Just don’t use Claude?

Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.

In other words, if one is going to try to hide automated writing, I think there should be a bare minimum effort to do so. That includes:

• Reading the text, to see if it makes any sense.

• Actually trying to pass it as human.

90% of AI slop is brain melting crap because this minimum bar isn’t even met.

…Okay.

I don’t agree. But let’s say I agree.

…Just don’t use Claude?

Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.

In other words, if one is going to try to hide automated writing, I think there should be a bare minimum effort to do so. That includes:

• Reading the text, to see if it makes any sense.

• Actually trying to pass it as human.

90% of AI slop is brain melting crap because this minimum bar isn’t even met.

…Okay.

Let’s say I agree; then just don’t use Claude for it?

Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.

In other words, if one is going to try to hide automated writing, I think there should be a bare minimum effort to do so. That includes:

• Reading the text, to see if it makes any sense.

• Actually trying to pass it as human.

90% of AI slop is brain melting crap because this minimum bar isn’t even met.

…Okay.

Let’s say I agree; then don’t use Claude for it? Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.