Andrew Nesbitt

@andrewnez@mastodon.social · Joined ⁨Apr⁩ ⁨2017⁩

Package Management Nerd, working on mapping the world of open source software ecosyste.ms and blogging about package managers at nesbitt.io

Homepage
nesbitt.io verified

Working on a license scanner for git-pkgs, uses the scancode license rule corpus but much, much faster and less resource intensive: github.com/git-pkgs/licenses

My plan is to eventually use it to scan every version of every package with it soon.

Fast exact license matching against ScanCode's rule corpus in pure Go. - git-pkgs/licensesGitHubGitHub - git-pkgs/licenses: Fast exact license matching against ScanCode's rule corpus in pure Go.Fast exact license matching against ScanCode's rule corpus in pure Go. - git-pkgs/licenses

Anyone else get the fear when they get a dependabot update for anything called xz? github.com/git-pkgs/archives/p

Bumps github.com/ulikunitz/xz from 0.5.15 to 0.5.16.

Commits

024f909 isterminal_fallback.go: ensure +build and go:build lines are consistent
ba40d80 Prepare release v0.5.16
82b346c internal/term:...GitHubBump github.com/ulikunitz/xz from 0.5.15 to 0.5.16 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #18 · git-pkgs/archivesBumps github.com/ulikunitz/xz from 0.5.15 to 0.5.16. Commits 024f909 isterminal_fallback.go: ensure +build and go:build lines are consistent ba40d80 Prepare release v0.5.16 82b346c internal/term:...by dependabot[bot]

I could not write this homebrew thread as a satire piece if i wanted to, real life is much more cursed: github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-c

brew config AND brew doctor output OR brew gist-logs <formula> link ○ → brew config bHOMEBREW_VERSION: 6.0.3 rORIGIN: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew HEAD: 5c38c6b3fc42281af432cda526dd0509172f681b...GitHubGemini-cli improperly deprecated · Issue #289444 · Homebrew/homebrew-corebrew config AND brew doctor output OR brew gist-logs <formula> link ○ → brew config bHOMEBREW_VERSION: 6.0.3 rORIGIN: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew HEAD: 5c38c6b3fc42281af432cda526dd0509172f681b...by tfmm

Replying to @⁨andrewnez@mastodon.social⁩

Similar looking data for Open Source Collective:

- $41.9M in total contributions to OSS collectives
- 1.8% ($763k) flows collective-to-collective at all
- 0.17% ($69,647) is in an actual loop
- The loops are dependency funding: eslint/jest/vite/webdriverio/verdaccio/11ty, parcel/rspack/swc

So on both platforms, 98%+ of open source funding is net new money in, not recirculation

Ever wondered how much circular funding there is within GitHub Sponsors?

Active Mutual Pairs: 155
Total Mutual Pairs: 845
Accounts Sponsoring Each Other: 255
Sponsorship Triangles: 42
Sponsorship Clusters: 26
Largest Cluster: 27 accounts

sponsors.ecosyste.ms/reciproci

sponsors.ecosyste.msReciprocal Sponsorships | Ecosyste.ms: SponsorsAn open API service aggregating public data about GitHub Sponsors.