Andrew Nesbitt

@andrewnez@mastodon.social · Joined ⁨Apr⁩ ⁨2017⁩

Package Management Nerd, working on mapping the world of open source software ecosyste.ms and blogging about package managers at nesbitt.io

Homepage
nesbitt.io verified

Replying to @⁨andrewnez@mastodon.social⁩

Similar looking data for Open Source Collective:

- $41.9M in total contributions to OSS collectives
- 1.8% ($763k) flows collective-to-collective at all
- 0.17% ($69,647) is in an actual loop
- The loops are dependency funding: eslint/jest/vite/webdriverio/verdaccio/11ty, parcel/rspack/swc

So on both platforms, 98%+ of open source funding is net new money in, not recirculation

Ever wondered how much circular funding there is within GitHub Sponsors?

Active Mutual Pairs: 155
Total Mutual Pairs: 845
Accounts Sponsoring Each Other: 255
Sponsorship Triangles: 42
Sponsorship Clusters: 26
Largest Cluster: 27 accounts

sponsors.ecosyste.ms/reciproci

sponsors.ecosyste.msReciprocal Sponsorships | Ecosyste.ms: SponsorsAn open API service aggregating public data about GitHub Sponsors.

Replying to @⁨andrewnez@mastodon.social⁩

The code and data for this post is over here: github.com/andrew/package-name

Prefix analysis of package names across PyPI, npm, crates.io, rubygems, hex, hackage and NuGet - andrew/package-name-prefixesGitHubGitHub - andrew/package-name-prefixes: Prefix analysis of package names across PyPI, npm, crates.io, rubygems, hex, hackage and NuGetPrefix analysis of package names across PyPI, npm, crates.io, rubygems, hex, hackage and NuGet - andrew/package-name-prefixes