WhyJiffie

@WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · Joined ⁨Jul⁩ ⁨2023⁩

Replying to @⁨Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it⁩

and I routinely get key errors

did you try reporting them? they are watching for reports, and they are making automated tests for all cases they receive. you should probably both open an issue in the client repo, and then use the “report a problem” button in the client and paste the github issue link. before you send the report open the chat with the decryption error, or try to reproduce it with a new message if you can, so that they can get better logs. probably also toggle on the “contact me”.

if you get a new message that can’t be decrypted, send a report from the client soon. don’t need to open a different issue if you don’t want.

Replying to @⁨ddd@feddit.org⁩

and that’s why you never ever use the latest tag, just below your comment: lemmy.ml/comment/26842059

lemmy.ml[AIT] paperless-ngx 3.0.0 - LemmyPaperless-ngx is an extensive document management system. 3.0.0 has just been released. It seems from a user/admin perspective that a lot of obsolete stuff under the hood got removed and they did some performance stuff, but it’s also full of AI features. There’s too many changes to read them all though, I wonder if there’s a blogpost or something somewhere summarizing the main changes. Personally I’ll stay with 2.X for some days at least to see what people say about the new version. I’m not interested to have AI parse my documents, the alrogirthmic auto tagging etc works quite well.

Replying to @⁨DeckPacker@piefed.social⁩

before reading the blog post I was thinking the same. now I don’t.

the worst of the LLM projects have no place on codeberg that’s for sure, but there would have been better ways than a blanket ban to limit the resource consumption of LLM and crypto projects. codeberg already has a storage quota system, they could be giving a lower quota for LLM projects, maybe also disable free CI for them, which I am a bit surprised they have given. and solve the reputation problem with banners. but no, total blanket ban based on feelings, it is.

Replying to @⁨SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone⁩

The decisions did go through Codeberg’s own Assembly 2026, which is more process than most platforms bother with, and yet as an ordinary user I found out about it the way probably most people else did, through a dark blue banner at the top of the site on the day it was already settled.

I did not even get to know about this that way. Only now, a month later from some backyard forum.

Replying to @⁨CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world⁩

If you’ve uploaded a photo of yourself with PII data (eg. your name), then that information can be scraped and used by ethically void companies (most of them) to build a database with your information on it. All without your knowledge or consent.

that’s not what I debate, sorry. if you look at it that way, we all might have lost that battle, without exceptions, because of gov ID photos.

my point is that the battle is not lost by facial recognition companies getting your photo, but when your area uses cameras related to a facial recognition company, and your community cannot get rid of them.

Replying to @⁨CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world⁩

it is false. it is not uploading a photo of yourself that makes this a bad thing. its not only bad because it recognized be on a facebook photo. the major part that makes it bad that these systems are recording, and uploading data god knows where, no matter the format, with total unaccountability to the average person.

that won’t make it known where will I be at any later point in time.

I’m sorry, what??

by uploading a photo, nobody will know what will happen to me in my life in the future. these camera systems are the things that do that.