← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is a whole industry manufacturing analogue. That cost must be amortised across every user, not attributable to one person, to be a fair apples to apples comparison.

We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.

See my reply elsewhwere to NGram.

Edited

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is a whole industry manufacturing analogue. That cost must be amortised across every user, not attributable to one person, to be apples to apples.

We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.

See my reply elsewhwere to NGram.

Edited

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is a whole industry manufacturing analogue, which is exactly the point: that cost must be amortised across every user, not attributable to one person.

We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.

See my reply elsewhwere to NGram.

Edited

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is a manufacturing analogue, which is exactly the point: that cost must be amortised across every user, not attributable to one person.

We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.

See my reply elsewhwere to NGram.

Edited

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is a manufacturing analogue, which is exactly the point: that cost is amortised across every user, not attributable to one person.

We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.

See my reply elsewhwere to NGram.

Edited

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is a manufacturing analogue, which is exactly the point: that cost is amortised across every user, not charged to one person.

We can compare 1 person to 1 person, or 1 industry to 1 industry. We can’t fairly compare 1 person to 1 industry.

See my reply elsewhwere to

Original

Because 1 person is responsible for 1 person’s cost of inference.

Training is the manufacturing analogue, which is exactly the point: that cost is amortised across every user, not charged to one person.