← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

You are of course free to downvote as you see fit - that’s what it’s there for. Likewise, I’m am free to write as I do / not sand down how I write for the sake of votes.

On the vote count: you may have missed the deleted posts here and elsewhere. The ratio wasn’t the issue.

On the rest - “whether it’s healthy for you”, “splitting the community”, “radicalize” - that’s a lot of weight to put on someone asking a straightforward question about community norms. You’ve framed a genuine query as a faction rally, and slipped in a dig about my wellbeing while doing it. That’s the part I’d call unfair, and I think you know it.

Edited

You are of course free to downvote as you see fit - that’s what it’s there for. Likewise, I’m not going to sand down how I write for the sake of votes.

On the vote count: you may have missed the deleted posts here and elsewhere. The ratio wasn’t the issue.

On the rest - “whether it’s healthy for you”, “splitting the community”, “radicalize” - that’s a lot of weight to put on someone asking a straightforward question about community norms. You’ve framed a genuine query as a faction rally, and slipped in a dig about my wellbeing while doing it. That’s the part I’d call unfair, and I think you know it.

Original

You are of course free to downvote as you see fit - that’s what it’s there for. Likewise, I’m not going to sand down how I write for the sake of votes.

On the vote count: you may have missed the deleted posts here and elsewhere. The ratio wasn’t the issue.

On the rest - “whether it’s healthy for you”, “splitting the community”, “radicalize” - that’s a lot of weight to put on someone asking a straightforward question about community norms. You’ve framed a genuine query as a faction rally, and slipped in a dig about my wellbeing while doing it. That’s the part I’d call a misread, and I think you know it.