GoatSynagogue

You really need to ask someone who knows what React is about React lol. It is not a UI for web apps.

Using “web based components” doesn’t make something a web app 🤣.

Is steam a web app?

Microsoft also made and use this……

learn.microsoft.com/…/react-native-for-windows

Using LLMs for development is fantastic as long as you know how to use it, which is how it is for every tool.

The difference with LLMs and other tools is that anyone can use them easily and get incredible results……as long as you don’t look under the covers. The developers that use them well are getting results and code that are indistinguishable from code they’d write themselves.

1. Doesn’t even come close to proving anything.
2. Proves nothing. Is edge a web app?
3. The start menu is not a web app.
4. React does not mean web lol. React is a UI library.

Shill? Explaining why something isn’t a “web app” is shilling now? Geez you commies are getting really loose with your definitions now.

Why are you using onedrive if you don’t want your stuff in the cloud?

It’s a native Windows app. What makes you think it’s “coded with web tech”? Do you know it’s just a web wrapper?

Doesn’t really matter where it’s doing what. It’s displaying it all on device. It’s caching stuff on device.

Read the article….

There are no changes on Google TV, Google Home or smart displays at this stage.

Dumb people use their tools incorrectly. That’s all you’re describing.

Yep I’ve got nearly 30 years of professional dev experience and Claude code/copilot/etc are absolutely groundbreaking.

It’s not a “web app”. It’s a native Windows app. A photo library app that indexes every single photo so you can search them with natural language like “green shirt”, group people by facial recognition, and edit photos, using under 1GB of RAM is impressive.

On the contrary - the people who tell you AI doesn’t add any value and will disappear in a few years are either lying, dumb, or completely ignorant of what AI can already do.

Yes, it is. That was my point in the first comment of this chain.

Websites and web applications don’t trust the user though, or at least they shouldn’t. They should all be doing server side verification and checking of anything the user inputs. This is why some banks will let you use their website on an old phone but not their app.

Yes, and you seem to have missed the point.

They won’t trust your device no matter how secure you say it is. That’s my point. Just because you say a device is secure doesn’t mean it’s secure, and it doesn’t mean it gets treated as if it’s secure.

You imply it’s broken and that you could “fix” it. Both are untrue.

I’m talking about every service that you use your device for. They will not and should not trust some random phone owner that their device is secure and safe to let use their services. They will, however, trust Google saying that the device is secure and not tampered with - as they should.

Yes and no. Yes in terms of architecture, no in terms of repairability and design. How many computers have a SoC with soldered RAM? How many computers don’t let you upgrade the cpu or GPU? Good luck trying to repair the GPU or cpu or ram or SSD on a modern console. It’s just not feasible. Not because they don’t want you to, but because of how intricate and specialised they are. The parts that you could repair on a console are already easily repair/replaceable.

That’s perfectly fair imo. If you aren’t making your payments you are violating your contract and they are well within their rights to disable the car.

The reason is obvious, which is why I didn’t think I had to say it lol

Imagine if you went to work at a bank in IT for example. They issue you a laptop. You go “oh no it’s ok I’ll use my own, I assure you it’s secure and safe”.

You connect to their network and instantly their network is compromised, every device on the whole network gets a cryptolocker virus.

You said it was secure though, so how did this happen?

You can trust it all you want, but other systems absolutely do not have to, and anything that requires security assurances will not and should not trust it. The device owners word/assurance means nothing.